Abstract:Background & aims: With advances in endoscopic imaging, it is possible to differentiate adenomatous from hyperplastic diminutive (1-5 mm) polyps during endoscopy. With the optical Resect-and-Discard strategy, these polyps are then removed and discarded without histopathology assessment. However, failure to recognize adenomas (vs hyperplastic polyps), or discarding a polyp with advanced histologic features, could result in a patient being considered at low risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia, resulting in an inappropriately long surveillance interval. We collected data from international cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy to determine what proportion of patients are high risk because of diminutive polyps advanced histologic features and their risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia. Methods: We collected data from 12 cohorts (in the United States or Europe) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after a positive result from a fecal immunochemical test (FIT cohort, n = 34,221) or undergoing colonoscopies for screening, surveillance, or evaluation of symptoms (colonoscopy cohort, n = 30,123). Patients at high risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia were defined as patients with polyps that had advanced histologic features (cancer, high-grade dysplasia, ≥25% villous features), 3 or more diminutive or small (6-9 mm) nonadvanced adenomas, or an adenoma or sessile serrated lesion ≥10 mm. Using an inverse variance random effects model, we calculated the proportion of diminutive polyps with advanced histologic features; the proportion of patients classified as high risk because their diminutive polyps had advanced histologic features; and the risk of these patients for metachronous advanced neoplasia. Results: In 51,510 diminutive polyps, advanced histologic features were observed in 7.1% of polyps from the FIT cohort and 1.5% polyps from the colonoscopy cohort (P = .044); however, this difference in prevalence did not produce a significant difference in the proportions of patients assigned to high-risk status (0.8% of patients in the FIT cohort and 0.4% of patients in the colonoscopy cohort) (P = .25). The proportions of high-risk patients because of diminutive polyps with advanced histologic features who were found to have metachronous advanced neoplasia (17.6%) did not differ significantly from the proportion of low-risk patients with metachronous advanced neoplasia (14.6%) (relative risk for high-risk categorization, 1.13; 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.61). Conclusion: In a pooled analysis of data from 12 international cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or evaluation of symptoms, we found that diminutive polyps with advanced histologic features do not increase risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia.

Adenoma Detection Rate and Clinical Characteristics Influence Advanced Neoplasia Risk after Colorectal Polypectomy

A Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched Investigation of the Occurrence, Management, and Prognosis of Anal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients

Predicting Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Adenoma Removal in a Large, Community-based Setting.

A prognostic model for advanced colorectal neoplasia recurrence

Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Adenoma and Incident Colorectal Cancer Based on Findings of the Baseline Colonoscopy

Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Factors Predicting the Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening of a Chinese Population

New Predictors of Recurrence in Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: a Retrospective Analysis of Risk Stratification for Advanced Adenomas and Polyps

Risk of advanced neoplasia after removal of colorectal adenomas with high-grade dysplasia

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Risk Factors Related to Polyp Miss Rate of Short-Term Repeated Colonoscopy

Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence Rates among Post-Polypectomy Patients in the Placebo-Controlled Groups of Randomized Clinical Trials: a Meta-Analysis.

Adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: how can it be improved?

Factors influencing the detection rates of colonoscopic polyp and adenoma in high-risk population in colorectal cancer screening

Diminutive Polyps With Advanced Histologic Features Do Not Increase Risk for Metachronous Advanced Colon Neoplasia

Adenoma Detection Rate and Polyp Detection Rate among Gastroenterology Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study

Mo1712 AUTOMATIC POLYP DETECTION DURING COLONOSCOPY INCREASES ADENOMA DETECTION: AN INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY

A population-based analysis on the incidence of metachronous colon cancer after endoscopic resection of advanced adenomas with high-grade dysplasia: does location matter?

Risk of Advanced Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer, and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in People With Low-Risk Adenomas at Baseline Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Risk Factors for Metachronous Adenoma in Patients with Stage I/II Colorectal Cancer after Radical Surgery

Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies