Abstract:OBJECTIVES: The decision tree underlying current practice guidelines for post polypectomy surveillance relies on risk stratification based on predictive attributes gleaned from adenomas removed on screening colonoscopy examination. Our primary aim was to estimate the magnitude of association between baseline adenoma attributes and the risk of adenoma recurrence and invasive colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC). Our secondary aims were to estimate the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of surveillance compared with screening colonoscopies and describe time trends in preventive colonoscopy utilization.METHODS: We used prospective analyses of retrospectively collected clinical data from electronic health records. A cohort of primary care patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening was assembled encompassing 110,452 subjects, of which 3,300 had adenomas removed on screening examination. Of those patients who had a follow-up surveillance colonoscopy (defined as a patient with a documented adenoma on prior colonoscopy) recorded during the study period, 537 had a recurrent adenoma.RESULTS: Of those recurrent adenomas, 354 had a high-risk attributes. High-risk attributes were described at >3 adenomas, at least one adenoma >10 mm in size, high-grade dysplasia, or villous features. The risk of developing invasive CRC among post polypectomy patients was significantly higher if the baseline adenomas displayed any of the following attributes: more numerous than 3 (4.3-fold higher risk, 95% confidence interval (CI) low, high 1.4, 12.9), larger than 10 mm in size (5.2-fold higher risk, 95% CI low, high 1.8, 15.1), high-grade dysplasia (13.2-fold risk, 95% CI low, high 2.8, 62.1), or villous features (7.4-fold higher risk, 95% CI low, high 2.5, 21.5). These attributes combined added a net value of 22.8% to the probability of correctly predicting CRC. There was a threefold increase in surveillance utilization relative to screening from 2005 to 2011. The ADR of surveillance (34.1%) was 1.5-fold higher than that of screening (23.1%).CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the need to mitigate excessive risk by performing timely surveillance colonoscopies in patients with baseline adenomas displaying high-risk attributes as recommended in practice guidelines.

Quality of Preoperative Colonoscopy Affects Missed Postoperative Adenoma Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas

Bowel Preparation, Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time and Adenoma Detection Rate: A Prospective Study of Screening Colonoscopies

Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program

Risk Factors Related to Polyp Miss Rate of Short-Term Repeated Colonoscopy

Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association with Adenoma Detection

What Level of Bowel Prep Quality Requires Early Repeat Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Preparation Quality on Adenoma Detection Rate

Excellent Bowel Preparation Quality Is Not Superior to Good Bowel Preparation Quality for Improving Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate

Personal Instruction for Patients Before Colonoscopies Could Improve Bowel Preparation Quality and Increase Detection of Colorectal Adenomas

Adenomas and carcinomas missed in routine colonoscopy: a prospective study in resected colon segments

Adenoma Detection Rate and Clinical Characteristics Influence Advanced Neoplasia Risk after Colorectal Polypectomy

Analysis Of Colonic Adenomas Recurrence After Adenoma Removes

Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies

Design and verification of individualized follow-up strategy of colonoscopy for postoperative patients with colorectal cancer

Predictive Factors and Surgical Impact of Colonoscopy Accuracy for Localization of Colorectal Malignancy

Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Adenoma and Incident Colorectal Cancer Based on Findings of the Baseline Colonoscopy

Colon Polyp Detection in Primary Health Care Institutions of Korea: Detection Rate and Issues with Following the Guidelines

Su1321 “Adenoma Detection Rates” - How Far Can We Push the Envelope?

The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence

Differences in the prevalence of colorectal polyps in patients undergoing endoscopic removal of gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer and in healthy individuals