Abstract:The last issue for 2016 represents the healthy state of Australasian otolaryngology research. This issue presents two excellent examples of secondary research efforts to tackle controversial topics. The role of vidian neurectomy is addressed by Marshak et al. who demonstrate a body of evidence for its role in both mixed and non-allergic rhinitis. The concerns that many have about its potential for adverse events are not as high as anecdotally stated. Although the other review, on balloon dilatation for eustachian tube dysfunction, presents evidence from a more nascent field of surgical experience, it is still supported by nine studies and more than seven hundred patients. The authors demonstrate that there is clearly more than a placebo effect, as both symptoms and tympanometry findings are affected by balloon procedures. There is obviously a need to separate the effects of surgery from the natural history of the condition and the influence of other interventions, but it’s an exciting area of research on a very common condition. Australia is fortunate to have great neuro-otology centres, and they share their experience. Prof Friedland’s group from Perth report their work in tackling chronic suppurative otitis media, and describe a staged approach to achieve both a dry ear and enable subsequent cochlear implantation and hearing restoration. The role of an experienced lateral skull base team in the management of carotid aneurysms is reviewed by Mukherjee et al. as they critique the outcomes of both open and endovascular approaches in a small series of patients requiring intervention. This skull base experience is also shared by the Brisbane group as they present their approach to imaging of the anterior skull base. Such local expertise is essential as it blends training, an evidence-based approach, with the availability of local resources in Australia into a practical algorithm. Australian surgeons lead the world in our experience with melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and metastatic parotid disease. The experience of Park et al. further validates the current practice of adding at least a selective neck dissection in the management of metastatic parotid disease. With a 17 per cent rate of occult disease in the node-negative neck, the current approach appears to be supported. They also highlight the ‘at risk’ groups with immunosuppression, in which a more aggressive treatment strategy might be appropriate. Similarly, the Westmead group review the role of wide midline neck dissection to improve the outcomes of thyroglossal duct management. They present a smaller series, helping to define the anatomy and their clinical experience in patients with prior treatment. This issue is full with original research from Australasian researchers. I encourage all otolaryngologists to consider The Journal of Laryngology & Otology as the destination for publication. The Journal has recently moved forward in impact factor and is now a Q2 journal within the otolaryngology group. Quality research efforts from Australia are almost certainly a contributing factor to this success.

Motilibacter peucedani gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil.

Bowel Preparation, Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time and Adenoma Detection Rate: A Prospective Study of Screening Colonoscopies

[Association Between Lifestyle-Related Factors and Colorectal Adenoma].

Adenoma characteristics in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association with Adenoma Detection

Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates

Quality of Preoperative Colonoscopy Affects Missed Postoperative Adenoma Detection in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Angiographic Localization of Insulinomas: High Reported Success Rate and Two Additional Cases

From legacy to novel: vidian neurectomy and eustachian tube balloon dilatation in modern ENT practice

Higher Adenoma Detection Rates with Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy – A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies

Su1321 “Adenoma Detection Rates” - How Far Can We Push the Envelope?

Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence

Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Adenoma and Incident Colorectal Cancer Based on Findings of the Baseline Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy quality and endoscopist factors: what are the required endoscopist conditions for high-quality colonoscopy to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality?

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas

Personal Instruction for Patients Before Colonoscopies Could Improve Bowel Preparation Quality and Increase Detection of Colorectal Adenomas

Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial

A prospective RCT comparing combined chromoendoscopy with water exchange (CWE) vs water exchange (WE) vs air insufflation (AI) in adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy

Adenoma Detection Rate and Clinical Characteristics Influence Advanced Neoplasia Risk after Colorectal Polypectomy