IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Impact of Individual Colonoscopy Quality Scorecards on Adenoma Detection Rates

Yi-Ping Ren,Jonathan Wei-Jie Lee,Calvin Koh,Li-Lin Lim,Reuben Kong-Min Wong,Wai-Kit Cheong,Ker-Kan Tan,Soh-Ee Lee,Feng Zhu,Khay-Guan Yeoh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-iddf.222

2022-01-01

Abstract:Background Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a measure of colonoscopy quality. Increased colonoscopy performance has been associated with lower interval colorectal cancer rates and mortality from colorectal cancer. However, studies evaluating the impact of endoscopic performance feedback on ADR and other quality markers are lacking. Our study thus aimed to evaluate the effect of the implementation and withdrawal of individual endoscopic scorecards on ADR. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of individuals aged 50 to 75 who underwent complete endoscopies at National University Hospital, Singapore, from March 2014 to December 2019. Pertinent demographic and procedural factors including subjects’ age, gender, bowel cleanliness, and withdrawal time were collected. After one year of baseline data collection, endoscopists were informed of colonoscopy quality tracking through department briefings. After an adjustment period, scorecards were confidentially issued every 6 months, displaying departmental averages and including feedback based on international benchmarks. Wilcoxon test was used for pre-and post-intervention analysis. The study design was approved by the institutional review board. Results We included a total of 9641 screening colonoscopies by 113 endoscopists, whereby the average age of the subjects was 58.9 years old (±10 years). With the intervention of scorecard feedback, we report a significant improvement in both ADR (29.1±2.9% vs 22.8±3.6%, p=0.04) and polyp detection rate (PDR) (42.3±3.3% vs 34.5±3.9%, p=0.03). The introduction of scorecards also resulted in longer withdrawal times (9.6±0.1mins vs 9.0±0.1mins, p<0.01) with an increased proportion of colonoscopies withdrawing beyond 6 minutes (78.8±5.3% vs 70.7±3.1%, p=0.09). Of note, the proportion of endoscopists with an ADR >25% increased from 69.2% to 80.8% after scorecard implementation. The high ADR (30.4±2.9%) and PDR (29.1±2.9%) were maintained even after the withdrawal of the scorecard intervention (IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Figure 1. Comparing adenoma detection rate polyp detection rate and proportion of colonoscopies with withdrawal time beyond 6 minutes pre-and post-intervention with colonoscopy scorecards). Conclusions The use of individual colonoscopy quality scorecards improved ADR. High ADR was maintained even after the withdrawal of scorecard intervention. There is potential for further studies on the automation of real-time feedback on colonoscopy quality to improve ADR.