Abstract:This year we celebrate 60 years of ESGE. However, the ESGE quality initiative is significantly younger and only a teenager. As we entered the 21 st century, it became apparent that GI endoscopy was not only about new technical achievements and innovations. Credit must be given to the United Kingdom, who for the first time analysed data from their national registry, and concluded that despite technical progress in endoscopy, many endoscopists were lacking in quality. Indeed, in 1999, a caecal intubation rate of only 56 % was reported [1]. In addition, the Polish registry revealed significant differences between endoscopists in adenoma detection rates, directly impacting the risk of interval colorectal cancers (CRC) [2]. With the introduction of CRC screening programmes throughout Europe, it became obvious that quality in GI endoscopy needed to be addressed to assure good outcomes for our patients and for society. With this in mind, from 2011 to 2016, ESGE conducted a series of quality in endoscopy symposiums addressing best "standards of care" in all fields of GI endoscopy. In parallel, in 2013, the ESGE Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) was launched under the chairmanship of Professor Matt Rutter [3]. From the beginning, the focus was not only on colonoscopy for which the evidence for high quality was accumulating. Indeed, it could be anticipated that for all fields of endoscopy, the risk of underperformance and associated underdiagnosis for patients was imminent. Therefore, ESGE developed for the first time, in collaboration with UEG, a set of key performance measures (KPMs) for each subbranch of endoscopic procedures with a focus on measurable, auditable, and achievable KPMs with direct impact on patient outcomes. From the start of the quality initiative, dissemination of the KPMs to achieve wide implementation was the main goal, resulting in a series of thematic ESGE meetings on quality in endoscopy and educational sessions at UEG Week. Moreover, several ESGE member societies picked up the theme for dedicated quality sessions at their national meetings. According to an ESGE survey conducted in 2021, 75 % of the ESGE member societies explicitly promoted the KPMs and took a leading role by endorsing, adapting, and translating the KPMs to facilitate local health authorities in the implementation process [4] ([Fig. 1]). However, 10 years after the initiation of the ESGE QIC, there is still a long way to go. Barriers for implementation of KPMs remain. Besides resistance to change and practicalities in auditing performance, one of the main barriers is the lack of regulation. Most national health care authorities are not consciously aware of the importance of quality in GI endoscopy. On the other hand, in countries where quality requirements were implemented by national bodies like JAG in the UK, quality has improved significantly. ESGE addressed this matter during a high-level summit meeting at the European Parliament in 2023, and we hope that more effort will be undertaken to further the implementation of KPMs in the European Union. In order to overcome the resistance to change and further stimulate KPM measurement, ESGE and QIC, under the leadership of Professor Raf Bisschops, developed a Quality Check App that allows ESGE individual members to audit their endoscopy practice more efficiently. The main hurdle for KPM assessment is the inclusion and exclusion criteria for endoscopic procedures that define the denominator. The ESGE Quality Check App will guide the assessor through the relevant procedure related questions and take indications and exclusion criteria automatically into consideration. Despite all the effort, the App is not widely used and therefore ESGE, under the guidance of the ESGE QIC, now led by Professor Monika Ferlitsch, issued an "ESGE Certification of Quality" to those centres that deliver proof of measuring KPMs in their endoscopy units ([Fig. 2]). While the ESGE QIC is analysing newly available evidence to update the KPMs in 2024, we must continue to further implement and disseminate the current KPMs. Quality reporting in GI endoscopy should become mandatory, like the endoscopy report itself. With regards to the latter, it is in fact still quite frustrating that in 2024, where instantaneously every flower, dessert or sunset can be shared with the entire world through social media, it remains in many cases not feasible to provide a report with high quality endoscopic photo documentation. To those who claim that additional remuneration should be in place for this, we would argue that perhaps an endoscopic procedure that does not meet certain quality standards should not be financially reimbursed. In the future, artificial intelligence has the potential to play an important role in automated quality control and we believe that the providers of endoscopic equipment should include such systems that automatically provide photo-docu -Abstract Truncated-

P926 Improved standards of colonoscopy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease through implementation of key performance measures - A quality improvement initiative

P523 The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in an Irish Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) cohort

Impact of Quality Improvement Educational Interventions on Documented Adherence to Quality Measures for Adults with Crohn's Disease

Improving Inpatient Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: A Successful Quality Improvement Project

IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Impact of Individual Colonoscopy Quality Scorecards on Adenoma Detection Rates

P286 Variation of outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease at ten Australasian centres - Crohn's Colitis Cure (CCC) Data Insights Program

Quality improvement exercises in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) services: A scoping review

Quality Metrics in Surgery Resident Performance of Screening Colonoscopy

A Review of Quality Improvement Process Measures for Colorectal Surgery in the United States Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database - Have We Made Progress?

Exploration of an Improved Bowel Preparation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Nationally Automated Colonoscopy Performance Feedback Increases Polyp Detection: the NED APRIQOT Randomised Controlled Trial.

Impact of cumulative experience on the quality of screening colonoscopy: A 13-year observational study

P713 The introduction of an intestinal ultrasound service significantly reduces diagnostic endoscopy usage in an Inflammatory Bowel Disease service – The SCOPELESS Study

Developing a Standard Set of Patient-Centred Outcomes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease-an International, Cross-disciplinary Consensus

The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborative: Design, Implementation, and Validation of a Disease-specific Module

ESGE – Advancing Quality in Endoscopy

Training Programs on Endoscopic Scoring Systems for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Lead to a Significant Increase in Interobserver Agreement Among Community Gastroenterologists

Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

Overview of a national endoscopy database: The Trans.IT database and its impact on data registration quality

Compliance with best practice recommendations for colonoscopy bowel preparation among hospitalized patients at a tertiary adult hospital.

DOP03 Gaps between ECCO quality standards of care and the real world: the E-QUALITY survey on processes and outcomes