Abstract:Abstract Background Although high and low volume polyethylene glycol(PEG) bowel preparations are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) before colonoscopy, sometime it is limited due to poor compliance. So, studies regarding novel low volume preparations in IBD are need, but, there is limited data. We aimed to evaluated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of oral sulfate tablet (OST) by comparison with 2L PEG and ascorbate (PEG/Asc) in patients with IBD. Methods One hundred ten patients with IBD were enrolled in this single-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority study. Patients were assigned either 2L PEG/Asc or OST to be administered in a split-dose regimen. OST patients were administered 14 tablets with more than 1L of free water in the evening, and the following morning. Colonoscopies were performed by blinded investigators. The primary efficacy endpoint was successful bowel cleansing rate, defined as Harefield Cleansing Scale grade A or B as evaluated by blinded endoscopist in each hospital. Secondary endpoints included the presence of residual air bubbles. Adverse events and laboratory evaluations were monitored to assess safety. Flare up of IBD symptoms and mucosa change associated with preparation were also evaluated. Tolerability, in terms of taste and degree of resistance to drink was assessed with VAS score by interview before colnoscopy. Safety was assessed by spontaneously reported adverse events, solicited ratings of expected prep symptoms, and laboratory testing. Results The cleansing score at all the segment was significantly higher in OST group. A high rate of cleansing success was seen with OST (98.1%), which was noninferior to 2L PEG/Asc (98.1%). Proportion of patients with bubble score 0 was significantly higher in OST than 2L PEPG/Asc group (94.5% vs. 50.0%, p<0.001). Satisfaction, in terms of easiness to drink (8.2 ± 1.6 vs. 6.0 ± 2.2, p<0.001) and taste(7.0 ± 2.8 vs. 5.4 ± 2.4, p=0.002) was significantly higher in OST group. More patients in OST group (94.5%) wanted to repeat the same preparation next colonoscopy. There was no significant difference in the development of vomiting and bloating between group. Aphthous ulcers were noted in the same number of patients in both group and symptom flare up were noted in 2 cases of OST group (p=1.000). No clinically significant differences were seen between preps for renal function and serum electrolyte. Conclusion Oral sulfate tablets achieved a high level of cleansing comparable with 2L PEG/Asc in patients with IBD. The risk of mucosal change or symptom relapse were not higher, on the other hand the degree of satisfaction was higher than 2L PEG/Asc. OST split method could be considered as one of the preparation method for patients with inactive IBD.

Exploration of an Improved Bowel Preparation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study in phase Ⅲ

Real-word Evaluation of Differences in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between the Digestive and the Non-Digestive Physicians: A Retrospective Study

Improved Capsule Endoscopy after Bowel Preparation.

A Randomized Study on the Effect of Different Bowel Preparation Methods Before Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients

P749 Comparison of bowel preparations for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Efficacy of BianShi Moxibustion for bowel preparation study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

A novel strategy for improving bowel preparation based on social software-enhanced education: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study

P233 Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate tablet for the bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: multicenter randomized controlled study

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of an oral sulfate solution and 3-liter polyethylene glycol on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial

Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis

Optimizing Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Chinese Population

Comparison of Two Litre Polyethylene Glycol Plus Bisacodyl Versus Four Litre Polyethylene Glycol As Preparation for Colonoscopy in Colon Disease: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of Walking Exercise and Intestinal Cleansing Interval on Bowel Preparation Quality, a Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving the quality of bowel preparation by smartphone education platform prior to colonoscopy: a randomized trail

Prepackaged formula low-residue diet vs. self-prepared low-residue diet before colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

A randomized controlled trial comparing a low-residue diet versus clear liquids for colonoscopy preparation: impact on tolerance, procedure time, and adenoma detection rate

Advanced intestinal regulation improves bowel preparation quality in patients with constipation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Bowel preparation efficacy and safety of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder combined with linaclotide for colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

Impact of Patient Education on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Observation of the application effect of low-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) combined with ascorbic acid tablets in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients