Abstract:Background: Quality of bowel preparation and patient knowledge remains a major barrier for completing colorectal cancer screening. Few studies have tested unique ways to impact patient understanding centering on interactive computer programs, pictures, and brochures. Two studies explored instructional videos but focused on patient compliance and anxiety as endpoints. Furthermore, excessive video length and content may limit their impact on a broad patient population. No study so far has studied a video's impact on preparation quality and patient understanding of the colonoscopy procedure. Methods: We conducted a single blinded prospective study of inner city patients presenting for a first time screening colonoscopy. During their initial visit patients were randomized to watch an instructional colonoscopy video or a video discussing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). All patients watched a 6 minutes long video with the same spokesperson, completed a demographic questionnaire (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JCG/A352) and were enrolled only if screened within 30 days of their visit. On the day of the colonoscopy, patients completed a 14 question quiz of their knowledge. Blinded endoscopist graded patient preparations based on the Ottawa scale. All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript. Results: Among the 104 subjects enrolled in the study, 56 were in the colonoscopy video group, 48 were in GERD video group, and 12 were excluded. Overall, 48% were male and 52% female; 90% of patients had less than a high school education, 76% were African American, and 67% used a 4 L split-dose preparation. There were no differences between either video group with regard to any of the above categories. Comparisons between the 2 groups revealed that the colonoscopy video group had significantly better Ottawa bowel preparation score (4.77 vs. 6.85; P=0.01) than the GERD video group. The colonoscopy video group also had less-inadequate repeat bowel preparations versus the GERD video group (9% vs. 23%; P<0.01). The overall score on the knowledge questionnaire (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JCG/A352) was significantly higher in the colonoscopy video group as compared with the GERD video group (12.77 vs. 11.08; P<0.001. In all patients the overall quiz score positively correlated with preparation quality (odds ratio, 2.31; confidence interval, 1.35-3.94; P<0.001). Conclusions: Our unique population represented an overwhelmingly under-educated (85% had a high school education or less) and minority group (76% African American). They are one of the most at risk of having multiple barriers such as comprehension and reading difficulties resulting in poor preparation examinations and no shows to procedures. Our instructional video proved to be high yield in this population. The patients assigned to watch the colonoscopy video showed a significant increase in "excellent" grade adequate bowel preparation quality by >23% and a significant decrease in "inadequate" bowel preparations by almost 50%. Our study proves that an educational video can improve both comprehension with regard to all aspects of colonoscopy. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02906969.

Impact of Patient Education on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Exploration of an Improved Bowel Preparation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Real-word Evaluation of Differences in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between the Digestive and the Non-Digestive Physicians: A Retrospective Study

Personal Instruction for Patients Before Colonoscopies Could Improve Bowel Preparation Quality and Increase Detection of Colorectal Adenomas

Improved Capsule Endoscopy after Bowel Preparation.

Improving the quality of bowel preparation by smartphone education platform prior to colonoscopy: a randomized trail

Online Educational Module Improves Knowledge of Nurses on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

[Patient-Related Factors Affecting Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy]

A study on the related influencing factors of the quality of bowel preparation and the compliance of middle-aged and elderly patients for colonoscopy

Optimizing Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Chinese Population

A Randomized Study on the Effect of Different Bowel Preparation Methods Before Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients

Improving Inpatient Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: A Successful Quality Improvement Project

A novel strategy for improving bowel preparation based on social software-enhanced education: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study

A Theory-based Educational Pamphlet With Low-residue Diet Improves Colonoscopy Attendance and Bowel Preparation Quality

Incidence and predicting factors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study

Telephone instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Feasibility of bowel preparation before colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgery ward

Educational Colonoscopy Video Enhances Bowel Preparation Quality and Comprehension in an Inner City Population

Lifestyle Factors and Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopy

A109 PATIENTS’ DESCRIPTIONS OF THEIR LAST BOWEL MOVEMENT BEFORE COLONOSCOPY CORRELATES STRONGLY WITH THEIR BOSTON BOWEL PREPARATION SCALE (BBPS) SCORE WHEN ASSESSED USING A STANDARDIZED METHOD

Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials