Abstract:Background Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a measure of colonoscopy quality. Increased colonoscopy performance has been associated with lower interval colorectal cancer rates and mortality from colorectal cancer. However, studies evaluating the impact of endoscopic performance feedback on ADR and other quality markers are lacking. Our study thus aimed to evaluate the effect of the implementation and withdrawal of individual endoscopic scorecards on ADR. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of individuals aged 50 to 75 who underwent complete endoscopies at National University Hospital, Singapore, from March 2014 to December 2019. Pertinent demographic and procedural factors including subjects’ age, gender, bowel cleanliness, and withdrawal time were collected. After one year of baseline data collection, endoscopists were informed of colonoscopy quality tracking through department briefings. After an adjustment period, scorecards were confidentially issued every 6 months, displaying departmental averages and including feedback based on international benchmarks. Wilcoxon test was used for pre-and post-intervention analysis. The study design was approved by the institutional review board. Results We included a total of 9641 screening colonoscopies by 113 endoscopists, whereby the average age of the subjects was 58.9 years old (±10 years). With the intervention of scorecard feedback, we report a significant improvement in both ADR (29.1±2.9% vs 22.8±3.6%, p=0.04) and polyp detection rate (PDR) (42.3±3.3% vs 34.5±3.9%, p=0.03). The introduction of scorecards also resulted in longer withdrawal times (9.6±0.1mins vs 9.0±0.1mins, p<0.01) with an increased proportion of colonoscopies withdrawing beyond 6 minutes (78.8±5.3% vs 70.7±3.1%, p=0.09). Of note, the proportion of endoscopists with an ADR >25% increased from 69.2% to 80.8% after scorecard implementation. The high ADR (30.4±2.9%) and PDR (29.1±2.9%) were maintained even after the withdrawal of the scorecard intervention (IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Figure 1. Comparing adenoma detection rate polyp detection rate and proportion of colonoscopies with withdrawal time beyond 6 minutes pre-and post-intervention with colonoscopy scorecards). Conclusions The use of individual colonoscopy quality scorecards improved ADR. High ADR was maintained even after the withdrawal of scorecard intervention. There is potential for further studies on the automation of real-time feedback on colonoscopy quality to improve ADR.

Impact of a scalable training program on the quality of colonoscopy performance and risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial

Association between improved adenoma detection rates and interval colorectal cancer rates after a quality improvement program

S467 A Retrospective Study Examining the Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Adenoma Detection Rate Amongst Non-Gastroenterology Endoscopists in a Rural Medical Center

IDDF2022-ABS-0205 Impact of Individual Colonoscopy Quality Scorecards on Adenoma Detection Rates

The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence

Effect of an online educational module incorporating real-time feedback on accuracy of polyp sizing in trainees: a randomized controlled trial

The Impact of Computer-aided Detection Technology in Adenoma Detection Rate Among Experienced Endoscopists in the Community Setting

Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-based Healthcare System

Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial

Choosing Your Endoscopist: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study

Quality Metrics in Surgery Resident Performance of Screening Colonoscopy

Randomized trial of patient outreach approaches to de-implement outdated colonoscopy surveillance intervals.

Impact of a Real-Time Automatic Quality Control System on Colorectal Polyp and Adenoma Detection: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study (with Videos)

Endoscopist adenomas-per-colonoscopy detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Colonoscopy quality and endoscopist factors: what are the required endoscopist conditions for high-quality colonoscopy to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality?

The single-monitor trial: an embedded CADe system increased adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized study

Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates

Colorectal cancer prevention by a CLEAR principles-based colonoscopy protocol: an observational study.

Screening Colonoscopy to Reduce the Incidence and Mortality of Colorectal Cancer

Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test–Based Screening