Effect of computer aided detection device on the adenoma detection rate and serrated detection rate among trainee fellows

Anas Khouri,Chance Dickson,Alvin Green,Abrahim Hanjar,William Sonnier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70018
2024-09-10
JGH Open
Abstract:The implementation of CADe in our study led to a significant increase in SDR without affecting the withdrawal time. There was a trend towards an increase in (ADR + SDR) but it did not reach statistical significance. Further and larger studies are required to determine the contexts where these devices can be helpful and to determine the patient's population that would benefit most from the implication of this technology. Background and Aims The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) with computer‐aided detection (CADe) has the potential to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by up to 30% in expert settings and specialized centers. The impact of CADe on serrated polyp detection rates (SDR) and academic trainees ADR & SDR remains underexplored. We aim to investigate the effect of CADe on ADR and SDR at an academic center with various levels of providers' experience. Methods A single‐center retrospective analysis was conducted on asymptomatic patients between the ages of 45 and 75 who underwent screening colonoscopy. Colonoscopy reports were reviewed for 3 months prior to the introduction of GI GeniusTM (Medtronic, USA) and 3 months after its implementation. The primary outcome was ADR and SDR with and without CADe. Results Totally 658 colonoscopies were eligible for analysis. CADe resulted in statistically significant improvement in SDR from 8.92% to 14.1% (P = 0.037). The (ADR + SDR) with CADe and without CADe was 58% and 55.1%, respectively (P = 0.46). Average colonoscopy (CSC) withdrawal time was 17.33 min (SD 10) with the device compared with 17.35 min (SD 9) without the device (P = 0.98). Conclusion In this study, GI GeniusTM was associated with a statistically significant increase in SDR alone, but not in ADR or (ADR + SDR), likely secondary to the more elusive nature of serrated polyps compared to adenomatous polyps. The use of CADe did not affect withdrawal time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?