Separation and recovery of ammonium from industrial wastewater containing methanol using copper hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF) electrodes

Rui Gao,Luiza Bonin,Jose María Carvajal Arroyo,Bruce E Logan,Korneel Rabaey,Bruce E. Logan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116532
IF: 12.8
2021-01-01
Water Research
Abstract:<p>Ammonium is typically removed from wastewater by converting it to nitrogen gas using microorganisms, precluding its recovery. Copper hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF) is known to reversibly intercalate alkali cations in aqueous electrolytes due to the Prussian Blue crystal structure. We used this property to create a carbon-based intercalation electrode within an electrochemical cell. Depending on the electrode potential, it can recover NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> from wastewater via insertion/regeneration while leaving organics. In the first phase, different binders were evaluated towards creating a stable electrode matrix, with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose giving the best performance. Subsequently, based on voltammetry, we determined an intercalation potential for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> removal of + 0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl, while the regeneration potential of the electrode was + 1.1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). Using the CuHCF electrodes 95% of the NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in a synthetic wastewater containing 56 mM NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and 68 mM methanol was removed with an energy input of 0.33 ± 0.01 Wh g<sup>−1</sup> NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. A similar removal of 93% was obtained using an actual industrial wastewater (56 mM NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, 68 mM methanol, 0.02 mM NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>, 0.05 mM NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, 0.04 mM SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> and 0.34 mM ethanol), with an energy input of 0.40 ± 0.01 Wh g<sup>−1</sup> NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. In both cases, there was negligible removal of organics. The stability of CuHCF electrodes was evaluated either by open circuit potential monitoring (61 h) or by cyclic voltammetry (50 h, 116 cycles). The stability during cycling of the electrode was determined in both synthetic and real streams for 25 h (125 cycles). The charge density (C cm<sup>−1</sup>) of the CuHCF electrodes declined by 17 % and 19% after 125 cycles in the synthetic stream and the actual wastewater, respectively. This study highlights the possibility of low-cost CuHCF coated electrodes for achieving separation of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> from streams containing methanol. The stability of electrodes has been improved but needs to be further enhanced for large-scale applications and long-term operation.</p>
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the differences in craniofacial structures and head postures between children and adolescents with nasal breathing and those with mouth breathing under normal facial growth patterns. Specifically, the study aims to classify breathing patterns by using measurable diagnostic tools and select patients through strict selection criteria, thereby evaluating the cephalometric differences between nasal - breathing (NB) and mouth - breathing (OB) children and adolescents. These differences include the position and morphology of the maxilla, mandible, upper respiratory tract and hyoid bone. ### Research Background Physiological respiration is often affected by anatomical or functional problems, resulting in the breathing cycle starting not only through the nose but also possibly through the mouth. Compared with children who breathe through their noses, children who breathe through their mouths are more likely to have symptoms such as restless sleep, night sweats and bed - wetting, and may even develop into sleep apnea syndrome. These low - quality sleeps will manifest as daytime drowsiness, irritability and headache, thus having a negative impact on academic performance. In addition, children who breathe through their mouths may also have nasal speech or speech disorders, increasing the risk of being misdiagnosed as having attention - deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and sometimes even being wrongly medicated. ### Research Objectives The main research objective is to evaluate the cephalometric differences in craniofacial structures (such as the form and position of the maxilla, mandible, upper respiratory tract and hyoid bone) and head postures between children and adolescents with nasal breathing and those with mouth breathing under normal facial growth patterns. The study hypothesizes that even among patients with normal facial growth patterns, there are anatomical differences in the craniofacial structures of children and adolescents who breathe through their mouths. ### Methods - **Participants**: Ninety - eight children aged 7 to 16 years were randomly recruited from the Comprehensive Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the University of Seville. These children had normal facial growth patterns and no exclusion conditions such as neurological or congenital diseases, genetic syndromes, craniofacial malformations, severe systemic diseases, respiratory allergies, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) or asthma. - **Measurement Tools**: The cranial index and facial index as well as cephalometric parameters (FP - MP) were used to confirm the normal facial growth pattern. The breathing pattern (mouth breathing vs. nasal breathing) was evaluated by the Airflow Sensor for e - Health Platform. - **Imaging Examinations**: Lateral radiographs were taken using X - ray equipment, and cephalometric analysis was carried out using a commercial software system. - **Statistical Analysis**: Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data. Quantitative variables were represented by means and standard deviations, and the differences between independent samples were tested for significance using the t - test or Mann - Whitney U - test. ### Results - **Children Group (7 - 9 years old)**: The upper respiratory tract distance (MPP) in the tonsil area of mouth - breathing children was shorter (p = 0.03). - **Adolescent Group (10 - 16 years old)**: The lower anterior face height (Xi - ANS - Pm) and palatal length (ANS - PNS) of mouth - breathing adolescents were higher (p = 0.015 and p = 0.049), and the position of the hyoid bone relative to the mandibular plane was lower (H - MP) (p = 0.017). There was no significant difference in head postures between the two groups. ### Discussion - **Facial Growth Pattern**: Mouth - breathing adolescents showed a greater lower anterior face height, which was consistent with previous research results. The mandibular plane inclination of mouth - breathing patients was larger, and the palatal plane rotated backward, which might indicate that the mandibular growth direction was vertical and developed into a Class II skeletal malocclusion. - **Hyoid Bone Position**: The position of the hyoid bone relative to the mandibular plane in mouth - breathing adolescents was lower, which supported previous research findings. - **Upper Respiratory Tract**: The upper respiratory tract space of mouth - breathing children in the 7 - 9 - year - old group was smaller, especially in the tonsil area (MPP), while there was no significant difference in the 10 - 16 - year - old group. This might be because the tonsils of children were more hypertrophic than those of adolescents. - **Cranio - cervical Posture**: Although 90.3% of mouth - breathing patients had changes in cervical posture, there was no significant difference in cranio - cervical hyperextension between the two groups, which might be related to the frequent use of mobile phones and tablets by young people. ### Conclusion Even among individuals with normal facial growth patterns, compared with nasal breathers, mouth - breathing children have differences in upper respiratory tract dimensions. Among adolescents, these differences also include changes in facial developmental structures and hyoid bone positions. These findings help medical professionals better manage patients with respiratory disorders and understand that breathing patterns may indicate developmental imbalances.