Abstract:Background: Anesthesiology departments and professional organizations increasingly recognize the need to embrace diverse membership to effectively care for patients, to educate our trainees, and to contribute to innovative research. 1 Bibliometric analysis uses citation data to determine the patterns of interrelatedness within a scientific community. Social network analysis examines these patterns to elucidate the network's functional properties. Using these methodologies, an analysis of contemporary scholarly work was undertaken to outline network structure and function, with particular focus on the equity of node and graph-level connectivity patterns. Methods: Using the Web of Science, this study examines bibliographic data from 6 anesthesiology-specific journals between January 1, 2017, and August 26, 2022. The final data represent 4453 articles, 19,916 independent authors, and 4436 institutions. Analysis of coauthorship was performed using R libraries software. Collaboration patterns were assessed at the node and graph level to analyze patterns of coauthorship. Influential authors and institutions were identified using centrality metrics; author influence was also cataloged by the number of publications and highly cited papers. Independent assessors reviewed influential author photographs to classify race and gender. The Gini coefficient was applied to examine dispersion of influence across nodes. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the relationship between centrality metrics, number of publications, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. Results: The modularity of the author network is significantly higher than would be predicted by chance (0.886 vs random network mean 0.340, P < .01), signifying strong community formation. The Gini coefficient indicates inequity across both author and institution centrality metrics, representing moderate to high disparity in node influence. Identifying the top 30 authors by centrality metrics, number of published and highly cited papers, 79.0% were categorized as male; 68.1% of authors were classified as White (non-Latino) and 24.6% Asian. Conclusions: The highly modular network structure indicates dense author communities. Extracommunity cooperation is limited, previously demonstrated to negatively impact novel scientific work. 2 , 3 Inequitable node influence is seen at both author and institution level, notably an imbalance of information transfer and disparity in connectivity patterns. There is an association between network influence, article publication (authors), and NIH funding (institutions). Female and minority authors are inequitably represented among the most influential authors. This baseline bibliometric analysis provides an opportunity to direct future network connections to more inclusively share information and integrate diverse perspectives, properties associated with increased academic productivity. 3 , 4.

Network Analysis of Past Presidents of the North American Skull Base Society

Network Analysis of the North American Skull Base Society Membership

A Decade of Global Skull Base Researchers: Authorship Trends from 3,295 Abstracts in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base

Diversity of Backgrounds and Academic Accomplishments for Presidents Elected to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Societies in the United States

An analysis of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Neuroscience from 2001 to 2006

Careers in Skull Base and Open Cerebrovascular Surgery: Factors Associated with Academic Job Placement

Mind the Gap: The Journey of Skull Base Specialties Toward Gender Parity

Exploring the Evolution of Research Connectivity and Funding in Global Neurosurgical Publications

Using Bibliometric Data to Define and Understand Publishing Network Equity in Anesthesiology

International Scientific Collaboration on Pituitary Research: A Social Network Analysis

The Development of Skull Base Surgery as a Discipline: Remembrances of Dr Jon H. Robertson

Differences in productivity and collaboration patterns on spine-related research between neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons: Bibliometric analysis

"Academic Influence and Industry Funding in Nerve Allograft Research: A Co-Authorship Network Analysis"

Publication patterns of posters and oral presentations at the Annual Meeting of the Joint AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section

Impact of medical academic genealogy on publication patterns: An analysis of the literature for surgical resection in brain tumor patients

Recent Trends in Plastic Surgery: A Network Analysis of the Abstract Titles of the Largest German Plastic Surgery Congress 2023

Five-Year Institutional Bibliometric Profiles for 119 North American Neurosurgical Residency Programs: An Update

Social Network Analysis of Biomedical Research Collaboration Networks in a CTSA Institution

Senior Mentorship and Scholarly Success: Assessing Influences on Successful Neurosurgery Residency Applicant's H-Index

Revitalizing neurosurgical frontiers: The EANS frontiers in neurosurgery committee's strategic framework

Five-year institutional bibliometric profiles for 103 US neurosurgical residency programs