Comment on “In utero gratification behavior in male fetus”

I. Meizner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5000

2017-03-01

Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract:I read with interest the research letter entitled: ‘In utero gratification behavior in male fetus’ by Rodríguez Fernández and López Ramón y Cajal. Looking at Figure 1 presented in the letter, one would have to conclude that the authors have made one huge error in the interpretation of the pictures presented. Picture no. 1 in Figure 1 represents a grasped normal hand with five fingers. What the authors mark as foreskin is the normal index finger. In picture no. 2 in Figure 1, one can see the flexed hand with five fingers. What the authors mark as meatus is the flexed index finger, a bit drawn backwards. The normal penis and scrotum are clearly visible in this picture, appearing medially to the clenched hand. I have indicated real penile tip and scrotum on a photocopy of picture 2, enclosed herewith. The penis and scrotum are clearly visible also in pictures 3 and 4, where the glans and foreskin indicated in these pictures really represent the index finger. There is neither meatus nor foreskin present in Figure 1. The real scrotum and penis are just in front of our eyes with an adjacent to normal clenched hand. I would recommend turning the three-dimensional image 90° clockwise, thus enabling full visualization of the fetal genitalia. This is easy to perform, because the authors state that they have the four-dimensional rendering.