Abstract:TO THE EDITOR: We read with great interest the article by Wadhwa et al.1 (Wadhwa H, Shah SS, Shan J, et al. The neurosurgery applicant’s “arms race”: analysis of medical student publication in the Neurosurgery Residency Match. J Neurosurg. Published online November 1, 2019. doi:10.3171/2019.8.JNS191256), in which the authors comprehensively analyzed the research productivity of neurosurgical residency applicants. Wadhwa et al. included the publication volume for all neurosurgery interns in 2009, 2011, 2014, 2016, and 2018, and showed that mean publication numbers among interns at the top 40 programs were significantly higher than that of other interns. Similarly, the 2018 National Resident Matching Report “Charting Outcomes in the Match” reported a significant difference in the mean number of scholarly works (abstracts, presentations, and publications) between matched and unmatched neurosurgery residents across the US (18.3 in matched applicants vs 8.9 in unmatched applicants).2 The mean number of scholarly works in matched neurosurgery applicants was also easily the highest amongst the matched applicants of all specialties analyzed in the report. The authors must be congratulated on their excellent work in providing an in-depth analysis of the research output of neurosurgery residency applicants. The results of this study suggest that neurosurgery is one of the more competitive residency specialties and research productivity is an important aspect in determining an applicant’s competitiveness. As such, one would expect medical students pursuing neurosurgery to excel in their research endeavors. Healthy competition drives productivity and growth in these students, spurring them to strive to learn and improve. This ensures that future residents are at their maximum potential at the point of entry into the neurosurgery program. Evidently, healthy competition benefits the development of both the individual student and the neurosurgical specialty in general. However, competitiveness is a double-edged sword. While healthy competition may be a driver of development, increased competitiveness can be an incentive for an individual to get ahead by any and all means necessary. An example of such unhealthy behavior is the misrepresentation of one’s research output on one’s application. In a recent article by Kistka et al., the authors analyzed all neurosurgery residency applications to Vanderbilt University in 2006 and 2012, and compared the incidence of publication misrepresentation between the 2 years.3 They demonstrated a significant increase in the rate of publication misrepresentation among applicants from 2006 to 2012 (33% vs 45%). Prior to the study by Kistka et al., the most recent analysis of neurosurgery residency applications by Cohen-Gadol et al. in 2001–2002 found misrepresentation in only 6% of all applicants of the Mayo Medical School.4 While we acknowledge that a direct comparison cannot be made between the studies due to the heterogeneous study samples comprising applicants of different residency programs, this huge difference suggests a rising trend in misrepresentation and should not be taken lightly. In a recent editorial, Dr. Heros very nicely outlined the reasons why research output can be so highly valued in today’s residency applications, as well as the factors that contribute to scholarly misrepresentation.5 Dr. Heros advocates for increased emphasis to be placed on the quality and impact of publications rather than the absolute quantity. We would like to add that providing recognition not just for the amount of research output, but more importantly for the work ethic, learning attitude, and values of a student or applicant (such as integrity and compassion), can also play a critical role in minimizing overemphasis on research numbers. In essence, healthy competition should always be encouraged, but not at the price of intellectual dishonesty.

Increasing Neurosurgical Resident Research Productivity Through Cultural Shift: Choosing Carrots Over Sticks

Changing the Culture: Increasing and Sustaining Anesthesiology Resident Physician Publication Rates

Preparing Residents to Navigate Neurosurgical Careers in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Yearlong Enhanced Didactics Curriculum

Analysis of academic publishing output among 1634 successful applicants in the 2011–2018 neurosurgery residency match

Impact of a Structured Roadmap, Individual Accountability and Support, and Outcome Measurement on the Culture of Scholarship in a Residency Program

Neurological Surgery Residency Programs in the United States: A National Cross-Sectional Survey

Analyzing international medical graduate research productivity for application to US neurosurgery residency and beyond: A survey of applicants, program directors, and institutional experience

Letter to the Editor. Healthy competition.

Five-year institutional bibliometric profiles for 103 US neurosurgical residency programs

The Growth and Development of a Research Division in the Plastic Surgery Department of a Large Urban Academic Medical Center

430 Academic Productivity of Neurosurgical Trainees Is Associated With Productivity of Gender Concordant Faculty

Evaluating innovation. Part 2: Development in neurosurgery

Factors Impacting Academic Productivity and Satisfaction of Surgeon-scientists

Education Research: Sustained Implementation of Quality Improvement Practices Is Observed in Early Career Physicians Following a Neurology Resident QI Curriculum

Senior Mentorship and Scholarly Success: Assessing Influences on Successful Neurosurgery Residency Applicant's H-Index

Exploring the gender gap in neurosurgery: A cross-sectional analysis of preresidency publications among neurosurgery residents

Exploring the 6-year Trend in Dedicated Research Years among Integrated Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Residents

Resident Self-Efficacy in Grantsmanship Lags Behind Key Funding Deadlines

339 Gender Concordance and Publication Productivity Within Neurosurgical Focus: A Ten-Year Review

Neurological Surgery Resident ABNS Written Exam Scores Before and After Introduction of a Weekly Didactic Educational Intervention: A 12-Year Single-Institution Retrospective Study

“Home Field Advantage”: The Presence of a “Home” Neurosurgical Residency Training Program is Associated With Improved Match Outcomes