Abstract:Background: Anesthesiology departments and professional organizations increasingly recognize the need to embrace diverse membership to effectively care for patients, to educate our trainees, and to contribute to innovative research. 1 Bibliometric analysis uses citation data to determine the patterns of interrelatedness within a scientific community. Social network analysis examines these patterns to elucidate the network's functional properties. Using these methodologies, an analysis of contemporary scholarly work was undertaken to outline network structure and function, with particular focus on the equity of node and graph-level connectivity patterns. Methods: Using the Web of Science, this study examines bibliographic data from 6 anesthesiology-specific journals between January 1, 2017, and August 26, 2022. The final data represent 4453 articles, 19,916 independent authors, and 4436 institutions. Analysis of coauthorship was performed using R libraries software. Collaboration patterns were assessed at the node and graph level to analyze patterns of coauthorship. Influential authors and institutions were identified using centrality metrics; author influence was also cataloged by the number of publications and highly cited papers. Independent assessors reviewed influential author photographs to classify race and gender. The Gini coefficient was applied to examine dispersion of influence across nodes. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the relationship between centrality metrics, number of publications, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. Results: The modularity of the author network is significantly higher than would be predicted by chance (0.886 vs random network mean 0.340, P < .01), signifying strong community formation. The Gini coefficient indicates inequity across both author and institution centrality metrics, representing moderate to high disparity in node influence. Identifying the top 30 authors by centrality metrics, number of published and highly cited papers, 79.0% were categorized as male; 68.1% of authors were classified as White (non-Latino) and 24.6% Asian. Conclusions: The highly modular network structure indicates dense author communities. Extracommunity cooperation is limited, previously demonstrated to negatively impact novel scientific work. 2 , 3 Inequitable node influence is seen at both author and institution level, notably an imbalance of information transfer and disparity in connectivity patterns. There is an association between network influence, article publication (authors), and NIH funding (institutions). Female and minority authors are inequitably represented among the most influential authors. This baseline bibliometric analysis provides an opportunity to direct future network connections to more inclusively share information and integrate diverse perspectives, properties associated with increased academic productivity. 3 , 4.

International Scientific Collaboration on Pituitary Research: A Social Network Analysis

Social network analysis of international scientific collaboration on psychiatry research

The Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network Analysis.

Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis

Macro-level Collaboration Network Analysis and Visualization with Essential Science Indicators: A Case of Social Science

Exploring the Evolution of Research Connectivity and Funding in Global Neurosurgical Publications

Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis

Innv-35. Data-Driven Modeling Of Emerging Trends And Collaborative Networks Across Brain Metastases Research: The Past Decade Of Innovation

Collaborative Initiatives in Neurosurgery Research and Publications Between High-Income and Low/Middle-Income Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis

Collaborative Characteristics and Networks of National, Institutional and Individual Contributors Using Highly Cited Articles in Environmental Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded

Understanding Biomedicai Research Collaborations Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study.

International Collaboration in Taiwan Emergency Department Publications: A Social Network Analysis

Pediatric Neuroscience Nursing Research: Knowledge domains and collaboration networks - A bibliometric analysis

Factors influencing the research impact in cancer research: a collaboration and knowledge network analysis

Using Bibliometric Data to Define and Understand Publishing Network Equity in Anesthesiology

Global Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence: Bibliometrics and Network Analysis from 1985 to 2019

The Influence of Author Degree Centrality and L-Index on Scientific Performance of Physical Education and Training Papers in China Based on the Perspective of Social Network Analysis

Scientific Collaboration Network in China's Knowledge Management field

Social Capital and Individual Performance: A Study of Academic Collaboration

Social network analysis of Iranian researchers in the field of violence

Disparity in the Evolving COVID-19 Collaboration Network