Abstract:Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus, terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. ‘feeling’, ‘knowing’ and ‘effort’) are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena. The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes. Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics. It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.

Chance, Choice, and Consciousness: The Role of Mind in the Quantum Brain

From quantum nonlocality to mind-brain interaction

A model of the quantum-classical and mind-brain connections, and of the role of the quantum Zeno effect in the physical implementation of conscious intent

Fermionic Squeezed State for Simple Algebraic Models in Many-Fermion Systems

Is Brain-Mind Quantum? A theory and supporting evidence

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction

Quantum information theoretic approach to the mind-brain problem

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction

Physics and Five Problems in the Philosophy of Mind

Beyond the Stalemate: Conscious MInd-Body - Quantum Mechanics - Free Will - Possible Panpsychism - Possible Interpretation of Quantum Enigma

The Quantum-Classical and Mind-Brain Linkages: The Quantum Zeno Effect in Binocular Rivalry

Quantum Brain Dynamics. A Possibility of Having a Quantum Interpretation of the Brain

Causal potency of consciousness in the physical world

Quantum Ontologies and Mind-Matter Synthesis

The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes

Quantum formalism for cognitive psychology

From Quantum Physics to Quantum Hypnosis: A Quantum Mind Perspective

Quantum Universe and its Elusive Classicality

Process, System, Causality, and Quantum Mechanics, A Psychoanalysis of Animal Faith

Reality in quantum mechanics, Extended Everett Concept, and consciousness

Quantum information in neural systems