Quantum Ontologies and Mind-Matter Synthesis

Henry P. Stapp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0105346

1999-05-18

Abstract:Aspects of a quantum mechanical theory of a world containing efficacious mental aspects that are closely tied to brains, but that are not identical to brains.

Quantum Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the ontological interpretation of quantum theory, especially how to take "knowings" in quantum theory as the basis for constructing nature and explore the role of consciousness in nature. Specifically, the author Henry P. Stapp hopes to reconcile two different interpretations of quantum theory: the strict Copenhagen Interpretation and the Vulgar Copenhagen Interpretation, and proposes a new ontological framework to understand quantum phenomena.

### Main Problems
1. **The Nature of Quantum Theory**:
- Since the Solvay Conference in 1927, quantum theory has been controversial, especially in its ontological interpretation. The traditional Copenhagen Interpretation emphasizes that quantum theory is a tool for human perception rather than a physical entity describing the real world.
- The author believes that the successful predictions of quantum theory indicate that it is not just a tool for human perception but can be used as the basis for understanding nature.

2. **The Synthesis of Consciousness and Matter**:
- The author attempts to establish a universe model based on "perception", in which consciousness (or perception) plays a causally effective role in brain dynamics without violating quantum statistical rules.
- This involves how to understand the evolution of consciousness and its role in nature, especially its manifestation in the brain.

3. **Causality and Non - locality**:
- There are some seemingly super - luminal influences in quantum theory, which conflict with the causality principle in relativity. The author solves this problem by distinguishing between signals and influences.
- Signals cannot travel faster than light, but influences can be considered as non - local phenomena in a broad sense, which provides a new perspective for understanding non - locality in quantum theory.

4. **The Differences between Classical Physics and Quantum Physics**:
- Classical physics assumes that the world is made up of matter, while quantum physics implies that the world may be made up of perception or information. The author attempts to bridge the gap between these two views and proposes a new ontological framework.

### Main Contributions of the Paper
- Proposes a new ontological framework that takes perception in quantum theory as the basis for constructing nature.
- Explains why past attempts have failed to remove the "mental pollution" in quantum theory and proposes new solutions.
- Explores the role of consciousness in nature and its evolutionary possibilities, especially its manifestation in brain dynamics.

Through these discussions, the author hopes to break the cautious position of traditional quantum theory and propose a more radical way of understanding, that is, to regard quantum theory as the basis for describing the real structure of nature.