Abstract:Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus, terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. ‘feeling’, ‘knowing’ and ‘effort’) are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena. The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes. Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics. It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.

A model of the quantum-classical and mind-brain connections, and of the role of the quantum Zeno effect in the physical implementation of conscious intent

The Quantum-Classical and Mind-Brain Linkages: The Quantum Zeno Effect in Binocular Rivalry

Monte Carlo simulation of quantum Zeno effect in the brain

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction

Chance, Choice, and Consciousness: The Role of Mind in the Quantum Brain

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction

A proposed mechanism for mind-brain interaction using extended Bohmian quantum mechanics in Avicenna's monotheistic perspective

Fermionic Squeezed State for Simple Algebraic Models in Many-Fermion Systems

From quantum nonlocality to mind-brain interaction

Quantum information theoretic approach to the mind-brain problem

Modeling observers as physical systems representing the world from within: Quantum theory as a physical and self-referential theory of inference

From Quantum Physics to Quantum Hypnosis: A Quantum Mind Perspective

Quantum information in neural systems

Consciousness and the Problem of Quantum Measurement

Is Brain-Mind Quantum? A theory and supporting evidence

Quantum-like model for unconscious-conscious interaction and emotional coloring of perceptions and other conscious experiences

Reality in quantum mechanics, Extended Everett Concept, and consciousness

A Pursuit of Quantum Neuroscience’s Principles: Coherence Field Theory and the Physics of Mind

Testing the Conjecture That Quantum Processes Create Conscious Experience

Beyond the Stalemate: Conscious MInd-Body - Quantum Mechanics - Free Will - Possible Panpsychism - Possible Interpretation of Quantum Enigma

Time and Consciousness in a Quantum World