Quantum information in neural systems

Danko D. Georgiev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050773

2021-05-04

Abstract:Identifying the physiological processes in the central nervous system that underlie our conscious experiences has been at the forefront of cognitive neuroscience. While the principles of classical physics were long found to be unaccommodating for a causally effective consciousness, the inherent indeterminism of quantum physics, together with its characteristic dichotomy between quantum states and quantum observables, provides a fertile ground for the physical modeling of consciousness. Here, we utilize the Schrödinger equation, together with the Planck--Einstein relation between energy and frequency, in order to determine the appropriate quantum dynamical timescale of conscious processes. Furthermore, with the help of a simple two-qubit toy model we illustrate the importance of non-zero interaction Hamiltonian for the generation of quantum entanglement and manifestation of observable correlations between different measurement outcomes. Employing a quantitative measure of entanglement based on Schmidt decomposition, we show that quantum evolution governed only by internal Hamiltonians for the individual quantum subsystems preserves quantum coherence of separable initial quantum states, but eliminates the possibility of any interaction and quantum entanglement. The presence of non-zero interaction Hamiltonian, however, allows for decoherence of the individual quantum subsystems along with their mutual interaction and quantum entanglement. The presented results show that quantum coherence of individual subsystems cannot be used for cognitive binding because it is a physical mechanism that leads to separability and non-interaction. In contrast, quantum interactions with their associated decoherence of individual subsystems are instrumental for dynamical changes in the quantum entanglement of the composite quantum state vector and manifested correlations of different observable outcomes.

Neurons and Cognition

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to use the principles of quantum mechanics to explain the conscious experience of the nervous system, especially the role of quantum coherence and quantum entanglement in the neural network of the cerebral cortex and their time scales**.

### Specific Problems and Goals

1. **Limitations of Classical Physics and Consciousness**:
- The paper points out that the deterministic framework of classical physics cannot explain causally effective conscious experiences. This has led to some insurmountable problems in the theory of evolution, such as how natural selection tolerates the existence of consciousness.

2. **Application of Quantum Mechanics**:
- The author uses the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics and the duality between quantum states and observables to provide new ideas for the physical modeling of consciousness.
- Through the Schrödinger equation and the Planck - Einstein relation (\(E = \hbar\omega\)), the appropriate quantum - dynamical time scale of the conscious process is determined.

3. **Importance of Quantum Entanglement and Interaction Hamiltonian**:
- The author constructs a simple two - qubit model, demonstrating the importance of non - zero interaction Hamiltonians in generating quantum entanglement and correlations between different measurement results.
- By using Schmidt decomposition to quantitatively measure the degree of entanglement, it is proved that the quantum evolution driven only by the internal Hamiltonian maintains the quantum coherence of the initial separable quantum state, but eliminates the possibility of any interaction and quantum entanglement.
- A non - zero interaction Hamiltonian allows the decoherence of individual quantum subsystems and their interaction and quantum entanglement.

4. **Quantum Coherence and Cognitive Binding**:
- The paper emphasizes that quantum coherence cannot be used for cognitive binding because it leads to separation and non - interaction.
- Instead, quantum interaction and its accompanying decoherence contribute to dynamically changing quantum entanglement, and cognitive binding is achieved through quantum entanglement in the extensive neural network of the cerebral cortex.

### Conclusion

The main conclusion of the paper is: **Quantum coherence is not suitable for cognitive binding, while quantum interaction and its accompanying decoherence are crucial for dynamically changing quantum entanglement, and thus may achieve cognitive binding in the extensive neural network of the cerebral cortex**. Therefore, a fast decoherence time scale can assist in achieving cognitive binding through quantum entanglement.

### Key Formulas
- Planck - Einstein relation: \[E = \hbar\omega\]
- Schrödinger equation: \[i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}|\Psi\rangle=\hat{H}|\Psi\rangle\]
- Total Hamiltonian: \[\hat{H}=\hat{H}_A+\hat{H}_B+\hat{H}_{\text{int}}\]

Through these theories and models, the paper explores the potential applications of quantum mechanics in explaining the conscious experience of the nervous system, especially the importance of the time scales of quantum entanglement and decoherence.