Abstract:Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus, terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. ‘feeling’, ‘knowing’ and ‘effort’) are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena. The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes. Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics. It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.

Quantum formalism for cognitive psychology

Nonquantum Cognition

Descriptive and Foundational Aspects of Quantum Cognition

Quantum information theoretic approach to the mind-brain problem

Modeling Human Decision-making: An Overview of the Brussels Quantum Approach

A model of quantum-like decision-making with applications to psychology and cognitive science

Fermionic Squeezed State for Simple Algebraic Models in Many-Fermion Systems

Quantum processes, space-time representation and brain dynamics

Quantum information in neural systems

Quantum aspects of high dimensional formal representation of conceptual spaces

On the Foundations of the Brussels Operational-Realistic Approach to Cognition

QuLBIT: Quantum-Like Bayesian Inference Technologies for Cognition and Decision

Psychological 'double-slit experiment' in decision making: Quantum versus classical

Are Quantum Models for Order Effects Quantum?

A QUANTUM-LIKE APPROACH IN UNDERSTANDING MODELING COGNITION AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES (REVIEW OF FOREIGN LITERATURE)

Quantum cognition based on an ambiguous representation derived from a rough set approximation

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction

Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty

Chance, Choice, and Consciousness: The Role of Mind in the Quantum Brain

Modeling observers as physical systems representing the world from within: Quantum theory as a physical and self-referential theory of inference

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction