Abstract:The scientific community is becoming more and more interested in the research that applies the mathematical formalism of quantum theory to model human decision-making. In this paper, we provide the theoretical foundations of the quantum approach to cognition that we developed in Brussels. These foundations rest on the results of two decade studies on the axiomatic and operational-realistic approaches to the foundations of quantum physics. The deep analogies between the foundations of physics and cognition lead us to investigate the validity of quantum theory as a general and unitary framework for cognitive processes, and the empirical success of the Hilbert space models derived by such investigation provides a strong theoretical confirmation of this validity. However, two situations in the cognitive realm, 'question order effects' and 'response replicability', indicate that even the Hilbert space framework could be insufficient to reproduce the collected data. This does not mean that the mentioned operational-realistic approach would be incorrect, but simply that a larger class of measurements would be in force in human cognition, so that an extended quantum formalism may be needed to deal with all of them. As we will explain, the recently derived 'extended Bloch representation' of quantum theory (and the associated 'general tension-reduction' model) precisely provides such extended formalism, while remaining within the same unitary interpretative framework.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve lies in exploring the application of quantum theory in cognitive science, especially in modeling the human decision - making process through the mathematical form of quantum theory. Specifically, the paper discusses the theoretical basis of the Brussels Operational - Realistic Approach, which is developed on the basis of the axiomatization and operational realism research of quantum physics. The authors point out that traditional cognitive models based on classical logic and probability theory cannot fully capture the actual ways in which people make decisions under uncertainty. Therefore, they propose quantum theory as a new and unified framework for understanding and describing cognitive processes. The paper mentions that quantum theory shows more effective advantages than traditional models when dealing with concept classification, probability judgment and certain phenomena in behavioral economics. However, there are also some situations, such as "question order effects" and "response replicability", which indicate that even the Hilbert space framework may not be sufficient to fully reproduce the collected data. This does not mean that the operational - realistic approach itself is incorrect, but rather that there may be a wider range of measurement types in human cognition, and an extended quantum formalism is required to deal with these problems. To meet these challenges, the authors propose an "extended Bloch representation" and the related "general tension - reduction model", which provide the extended formalism required to deal with the above - mentioned cognitive phenomena while maintaining consistency with the original explanatory framework. In summary, the main objective of this paper is to provide the theoretical basis for the application of quantum theory in cognitive science and to explore its potential and limitations as an effective tool for describing the human decision - making process.

On the Foundations of the Brussels Operational-Realistic Approach to Cognition

Modeling Human Decision-making: An Overview of the Brussels Quantum Approach

From Quantum Cognition to Conceptuality Interpretation I: Tracing the Brussels Group's Intellectual Journey

Descriptive and Foundational Aspects of Quantum Cognition

Quantum formalism for cognitive psychology

Context and Interference Effects in the Combinations of Natural Concepts

QuLBIT: Quantum-Like Bayesian Inference Technologies for Cognition and Decision

Operational Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Axiomatics and Quantum Structures

A model of quantum-like decision-making with applications to psychology and cognitive science

Beyond-Quantum Modeling of Question Order Effects and Response Replicability in Psychological Measurements

Modeling observers as physical systems representing the world from within: Quantum theory as a physical and self-referential theory of inference

The Separability Problem in Quantum Mechanics: Insights from Research on Axiomatics and Human Language

A QUANTUM-LIKE APPROACH IN UNDERSTANDING MODELING COGNITION AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES (REVIEW OF FOREIGN LITERATURE)

Psychological 'double-slit experiment' in decision making: Quantum versus classical

Towards a new quantum cognition model

The physics and metaphysics of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics

Experimental characterization of quantum processes: a selective and efficient method in arbitrary finite dimension

Quantum Structure in Cognition: Why and How Concepts are Entangled

Quantum reality: A pragmaticized neo-Kantian approach

Quantum affective processes for multidimensional decision-making

Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations