Abstract:Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus, terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. ‘feeling’, ‘knowing’ and ‘effort’) are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena. The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes. Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics. It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.

Putting Mind Back into Nature: a Tribute to Henry P. Stapp

On the Work of Henry P. Stapp

Quantum Ontologies and Mind-Matter Synthesis

Chance, Choice, and Consciousness: The Role of Mind in the Quantum Brain

A "Hermes" in the Era of Mind Science: Francisco Varela

Von Neumann's Formulation of Quantum Theory and the Role of Mind in Nature

Beyond the Stalemate: Conscious MInd-Body - Quantum Mechanics - Free Will - Possible Panpsychism - Possible Interpretation of Quantum Enigma

Physics and Five Problems in the Philosophy of Mind

Fermionic Squeezed State for Simple Algebraic Models in Many-Fermion Systems

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction

A model of the quantum-classical and mind-brain connections, and of the role of the quantum Zeno effect in the physical implementation of conscious intent

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction

Towards a Science of Mind

The Physics of Mind and Thought

The Elusivity of Nature and the Mind-Matter Problem

The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes

Values and the Quantum Conception of Man

The Quantum-Classical and Mind-Brain Linkages: The Quantum Zeno Effect in Binocular Rivalry

Quantum information theoretic approach to the mind-brain problem

Primal awareness, evolutionary restriction, life and the origin of quantum mechanics

The Mind-Body Relationship