The Comparative Study of Reaction Mechanisms and Catalytic Performances of Cu–SSZ-13 and Fe–SSZ-13 for the NH3-SCR Reaction

Kaiwei Qin,Lei Guo,Shujun Ming,Shoute Zhang,Yanbin Guo,Lei Pang,Tao Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-022-09353-z
2022-02-28
Catalysis Surveys from Asia
Abstract:The catalytic performances and mechanism differences of model catalysts Cu–SSZ-13 and Fe–SSZ-13 with similar metal content and Si/Al ratio were compared. In the NH3-SCR reaction, Cu–SSZ-13 had a good NO conversion at low temperature, broad active temperature windows and better hydrothermal stability. Fe–SSZ-13 showed better high-temperature NO conversion rate and better resistance to sulfur poisoning, but poorer low-temperature NH3-SCR activity. NH3-TPD verified the content difference of L-NH3 and B-NH3 of Cu- and Fe–SSZ-13. UV–Vis DRS, EPR, H2-TPR indicated the active species of Cu- and Fe–SSZ-13. Results showed that Cu–SSZ-13 only had one type active species of Cu2+, Fe–SSZ-13 had Fe3+ species that acted as active centers at low temperature and reactivity oligomeric Fe species at high temperature. The diffuse reflection infrared Fourier transform spectrum (DRIFTS) results showed that the reactions of Cu–SSZ-13 and Fe–SSZ-13 at low temperature both followed the Eley–Rideal (E–R) mechanism and the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L–H) mechanism. Cu–SSZ-13 could perform the catalytic process well under both mechanisms, but when Fe–SSZ-13 followed the E–R mechanism, there were many B-NH3 species, which was not conducive to the reaction. When following the L–H mechanism, the speed of NO3− participating in the reaction was slow due to ammonia inhibition, resulting in poor low-temperature activity.
chemistry, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?