Left on the shelf: Explaining the failure of public inquiry recommendations

Alastair Stark

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12630

IF: 3.5

2019-11-26

Public Administration

Abstract:<p>Public inquiries remain the preeminent mechanism for lesson‐learning after high‐profile failures. However, a regular complaint is that their recommendations get 'shelved'. In political science, the most common explanation for this lack of implementation tells us that elites mobilise bias in order to undermine inquiry lesson‐learning. This article tests this thesis via an international comparison of inquiries in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK. A series of alternative explanations for shelving emerge, which tell us that inquiry recommendations do not get implemented when: they do not respect the realities of policy transfer; they are triaged into policy refinement mechanisms, and; they arrive at the 'street‐level' without consideration of local delivery capacities. These explanations tell us that the mobilisation of bias thesis needs to be reworked in relation to public inquiries so that it better recognises the complex reality of public policy in the modern state.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>

public administration,political science