Abstract:In the quest for Smart City (SC) development, numerous examples of 'good practices' have circulated in national and international policy arenas. Learning from good practices elsewhere is a common approach for cities to initiate and develop SC policies of their own. Nevertheless, because of political, legal and cultural differences across countries and cities, policies will always be context dependent, and prosper under specific conditions. There is a vast literature on policy transfer and policy mobility, but much of it utilizes different concepts (i.e., policy translation, policy learning, and policy diffusion). Nonetheless, a critical omission they all share is limited concern for context-dependence and lack of prescriptive clues. Addressing both omissions would lead to a framework in which learning from good SC policy practices, formulating lessons, transferring them, and then adjusting them to fit the recipient's needs is taken up systematically in a stepwise manner. To develop a theo-retical framework for Smart City adoption, this study brings together variegated existing literature under the heading 'policy transplantation' and synthesizes existing insights into a prescriptive procedure policymakers can follow. A systematic literature review is conducted to identify all key elements and sub-elements associated with SC policy transplantation, leading to a theoretical framework. This (prescriptive) theoretical framework is subsequently validated using an expert group and illustrated through a real-life case. The framework can be used as an analytical lens by researchers, but also constitutes a practical tool to guide policymakers aiming to use insights from good practices and implement them in line with their own contextual setting. Conducting contextual assessment before transplanting a SC policy is essential.

The Pitfalls of Family Resemblance: Why Transferring Planning Institutions Between ‘similar Countries’ is Delicate Business

Drawing Institutional Lessons Across Countries on Making Transport Infrastructure Policy

An Insider's Look into Policy Transfer in Transnational Expert Networks

Two Contrasting Perspectives on Institutional Transplantation

Families of Nations and Institutional Transplantation

Exchanging experiences in transport infrastructure policies between Denmark and the Netherlands

Urban Transport Policy Transfer in Central and Eastern Europe

Institutional Transplantation and the Rule of Law: How This Interdisciplinary Method Can Enhance the Legitimacy of International Organisations

The Introduction of Public-Private Partnerships in the Netherlands As a Case of Institutional Bricolage: the Evolution of an Anglo-Saxon Transplant in a Rhineland Context

Transferring the Technology, Policy, and Management Concept from the Netherlands to China

The transfer of eco-city concepts to China: A selective and gradual policy transfer style?

Transplanting Good Practices in Smart City Development: A Step-Wise Approach.

Learning from abroad: An interdisciplinary exploration of knowledge transfer in the transport domain

The Impact of Institutional Structures on Transport Infrastructure Performance. A Cross-National Comparison on Various Indicators

International Experience and Enlightenment of Inventory Planning of Urban Land

Cross-national Transfer of Policy Models to Developing Countries: Epilogue

The Incorporation of Passenger Connectivity and Intermodal Considerations in Intercity Transport Planning

China's Art of Institutional Bricolage: Selectiveness and Gradualism in the Policy Transfer Style of a Nation

West-east policy transfer: the case of urban transport policy

Bypassing Institutional Barriers: New Types of Transit-Oriented Development in China

Two national models of infrastructure co-opetition