Two national models of infrastructure co-opetition

Martin de Jong,Heleen de Vlaam

2013-01-01

Abstract:The technological, economic and administrative environment of the various infrastructure sectors is changing, making some of the characteristics of infrastructures as they were recognised in the 1970s outdated. At the brink of the year 2000, the public sector is giving away at least part of its role of planner and financier of transport and telecommunications facilities. A dominant centralist role has been replaced by a hybrid relation with private parties in which co-opetition (co-operation at the level of construction of physical infrastructures themselves and competition at the level of attached services where most added value is captured) seems to best describe how various players are kept together. Though evolution in the environment of national policy-models drives countries to converge in their outlook and regulation of infrastructure services, the paper presented here makes clear that national interpretations in Britain and the Netherlands become more similar and cope partly with the same issues, but still choose different models to regulate their market for transport and telecommunications. Despite national interpretation of international development and regulations, we can say that in sectors which are evolving from scratch in an anarchic way, national models cannot be recognised even though some differences remain. Technological turbulence has created such a situation in the telecom sector. In policy sectors where change is slower and national models are not replaced but modified within the historical path dependency, national styles remain more visible. International convergence is taking place to some extent in new regulatory regimes, but the results for various countries are not identical and the results sometimes seem rather more amorphous and incomprehensible in terms of national styles.