Abstract:Systems for small-scale forestry are occasionally shaped by adopting models used by other countries. Such adoption is localized and adapted to suit needs and conditions of the country and reflects its specific characteristics instead of being simply copied. In this study, we examine the process of the adoption and adaptation of the forestry extension system in Japan and discuss the meaning of policy transfer across countries and the factors influencing policy development. Although the adoption of the forestry extension system was de facto a direct coercion enforced by the occupying United States (US) government in the early post-war era, in-depth analysis revealed it was a joint effort between Japanese and US foresters. The enthusiasm of foresters in charge of forestry extension enabled them to improve it into an idealized form. This first adaptation phase can be regarded as a very progressive step in view of trends indicated by a previous study. The adoption of the US model inspired and legitimized the new system. Results imply that policy development occurs at the level of the ruler, who sets the direction of the forestry extension, and the level of the practitioner, who is in charge of the extension activities in the field. Moreover, it demonstrates the importance of examining the significance and effectiveness of policy transfers and the adaptation of adopted institutions at each level. However, motivation and perception of practitioners toward their work and allowance for voluntary initiatives given to them is the key to this notion.

Two Contrasting Perspectives on Institutional Transplantation

The Pitfalls of Family Resemblance: Why Transferring Planning Institutions Between ‘similar Countries’ is Delicate Business

Drawing Institutional Lessons Across Countries on Making Transport Infrastructure Policy

Institutional Transplantation and the Rule of Law: How This Interdisciplinary Method Can Enhance the Legitimacy of International Organisations

Families of Nations and Institutional Transplantation

Transferring the Technology, Policy, and Management Concept from the Netherlands to China

Cross-national Transfer of Policy Models to Developing Countries: Epilogue

China's Art of Institutional Bricolage: Selectiveness and Gradualism in the Policy Transfer Style of a Nation

Making reform and stability compatible with each other: elite redeployment in Meiji Japan

Parallelism and evolution in transnational policy transfer networks: the case of Sino-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park (SIP)

West-east policy transfer: the case of urban transport policy

Exchanging experiences in transport infrastructure policies between Denmark and the Netherlands

Joseph Ben-David's Institutional Analysis on the Transfer of World Science Center

The Introduction of Public-Private Partnerships in the Netherlands As a Case of Institutional Bricolage: the Evolution of an Anglo-Saxon Transplant in a Rhineland Context

Transfer More, Benefit More? an Institutional Framework for Understanding the Use of Interorganizationally and Intraorganizationally Transferred Knowledge

Why do Institutions Change? Case Studies of Changes in the Local Government Finance System in Japan

Toward a New Theory of Institutional Change

Institutional Reforms and Unexpected Consequences:Political Analysis of the Development Model Transformation in Japan

Historical institutionalism in action: Incremental prevalence of Transit-Oriented Development in Tokyo 1945-1982

International transfer of vocational education and training: a literature review

Factors That Shaped the Forestry Extension System in Japan: Adoption and Adaptation of the United States Model After World War II