Abstract:nigel.hawkes1@btinternet.com Do published outcomes tell us what’s really going on inside a hospital? Nigel Hawkes reports on how standardised mortality ratios at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust came to conceal the hospital’s failings The new NHS in England aims to empower the patient and shame failing hospitals by measuring and publishing outcomes. Open data will make health providers honest and patients better able to choose between them. How simple is that? Rather too simple, to judge by evidence presented to the public inquiry into Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, which has shown that the old NHS had ingenious ways of burnishing its outcomes and concealing its failings. Even death, the most unambiguous outcome of all, lost its sting when changes in coding practice resulted in many deaths being excluded from the calculation of hospital mortality ratios. Whether this amounted to actual dishonesty may never be determined. In his final submission Tom Kark, counsel to the inquiry, suggested that it may not be necessary for Robert Francis, the inquiry’s chair, to make any finding of fact over claims that Mid-Staffs and two other West Midlands trusts engaged in a plan to lower their apparent mortality ratios by changing the way patients were coded.1 Nor did Kark reach any firm conclusion over the suggestion that West Midlands Strategic Health Authority (SHA) sought to muddy the waters by commissioning a critical report into mortality measures, published in the BMJ, from academics known to disbelieve in the method. Both these charges were made in evidence to the inquiry by Professor Brian Jarman, the father of the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR, see box), which has been used for the past decade by the health analytics company Dr Foster to compare hospital performance. By his reckoning, West Midlands tried to undermine the mortality data …

Infected blood inquiry: justice will only be delivered when all the recommendations are acted upon

The Infected Blood Inquiry: we need some honesty and engagement by those in authority

Infected blood scandal: "Chilling" cover up hid truth for decades, public inquiry finds

The voices of those affected by the infected blood tragedy were silenced for too long

Government criticised over failure to implement patient safety recommendations

How Cure the NHS Became the True Professionals at Mid Staffs.

My goal for the independent investigation into the performance of the health service in England

Regarding general practice: an appeal to the new UK Government

How the Message from Mortality Figures Was Missed at Mid Staffs

Gosport: Will Justice Ever Be Served?

Covid inquiry: communication failures impeded the UK's pandemic response

Did the Government Ignore Criticisms of the NHSin the Run Up to the Mid Staffs Scandal?

Any NHS reform has to avoid a repeat of 2012

David Oliver: Does Darzi's report move NHS recovery and reform further forward?

Still a long way to go on patient safety

Health department lacks grip on spending and clinical negligence payouts, MPs warn

Transfusion practice and safety: current status and possibilities for improvement

Respect, Compassion and Dignity: The Foundations of Ethical and Professional Caring

How did whistleblowing and the duty of candour get onto the agenda of the British national health service

Mitigating the impact of blood shortages in England

Left on the shelf: Explaining the failure of public inquiry recommendations