Abstract:Background: The UK government's reckless and incompetent response to Covid-19 has produced an outcome which is amongst the worst in the world, and arguably the worst in terms of deaths per 100,000 population of major countries (especially when one measures mortality from Covid in terms of cause of death on the death certificate, rather than the UK government's own measure-death of a tested individual within 28 days of testing). This article updates my initial analysis in this journal over a year ago, and traces the negligent and shambolic policy-making, and supine official scientific advice, which has led to such a dismal outcome. Methods: It does so by examining the policies and approach of the UK government from the begining of the pandemic (in UK terms, January 2020) up to June 2021. All relevant declarations, speeches, decisions, public interviews and policies were noted on a daily basis, examined and critically assessed-along with daily data and information over the whole period on Covid's threat to, and spread across, the UK. Conclusions: On three successive occasions, Boris Johnson and his compliant Ministers acted too late and too weakly to prevent avoidable death and illness. At the time of writing the vaccination programme in the UK has been destabilised by the government-yet again-having failed to secure its borders, this time against the Delta variant (Indian mutation) of the virus. Overall, in terms of border control, quarantine, testing, tracing, isolation and timely and enforced lockdown, the government put short-term, superficial considerations above coherent strategy. It dressed up its incompetence as a superficial libertarianism and defence of the economy, but thereby managed to achieve the worst of all worlds in terms of three egregious failures-appalling health outcomes; (ironically) worse economic damage than countries which took draconian action; and (also ironically) continually recurring restrictions as a result of earlier failure to take strong action to suppress Covid and keep it at bay. Public reaction in England (unlike in Scotland and Wales) to the Johnson government's shenanigans has not been commensurate with that government's level of failure, which sadly reflects a debasement of the political culture in England.

The Infected Blood Inquiry: we need some honesty and engagement by those in authority

Infected blood scandal: "Chilling" cover up hid truth for decades, public inquiry finds

The voices of those affected by the infected blood tragedy were silenced for too long

Infected blood inquiry: justice will only be delivered when all the recommendations are acted upon

How do we conduct a national transfusion related lookback program?

Modelling hepatitis C infection acquired from blood transfusions in the UK between 1970 and 1991 for the Infected Blood Inquiry

Transfusion practice and safety: current status and possibilities for improvement

How the Message from Mortality Figures Was Missed at Mid Staffs

Covid inquiry: communication failures impeded the UK's pandemic response

How Cure the NHS Became the True Professionals at Mid Staffs.

Transfusion sample mislabelling and wrong blood in tube in the UK: Insights from the national comparative audits of blood transfusion in 2012 and 2022

'We did everything we could': An account of toxic leadership

How safe is blood, really?

Government criticised over failure to implement patient safety recommendations

Transfusion medicine and safety

Mitigating the impact of blood shortages in England

My goal for the independent investigation into the performance of the health service in England

Protecting Blood Supplies

Two sides to every story: Reappraising the early history of liver transplantation at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge

Proceedings of a consensus conference: blood-borne HIV and hepatitis-optimizing the donor selection process

London 2017: Lessons learned in transfusion emergency planning