Abstract:Background: The UK government's reckless and incompetent response to Covid-19 has produced an outcome which is amongst the worst in the world, and arguably the worst in terms of deaths per 100,000 population of major countries (especially when one measures mortality from Covid in terms of cause of death on the death certificate, rather than the UK government's own measure-death of a tested individual within 28 days of testing). This article updates my initial analysis in this journal over a year ago, and traces the negligent and shambolic policy-making, and supine official scientific advice, which has led to such a dismal outcome. Methods: It does so by examining the policies and approach of the UK government from the begining of the pandemic (in UK terms, January 2020) up to June 2021. All relevant declarations, speeches, decisions, public interviews and policies were noted on a daily basis, examined and critically assessed-along with daily data and information over the whole period on Covid's threat to, and spread across, the UK. Conclusions: On three successive occasions, Boris Johnson and his compliant Ministers acted too late and too weakly to prevent avoidable death and illness. At the time of writing the vaccination programme in the UK has been destabilised by the government-yet again-having failed to secure its borders, this time against the Delta variant (Indian mutation) of the virus. Overall, in terms of border control, quarantine, testing, tracing, isolation and timely and enforced lockdown, the government put short-term, superficial considerations above coherent strategy. It dressed up its incompetence as a superficial libertarianism and defence of the economy, but thereby managed to achieve the worst of all worlds in terms of three egregious failures-appalling health outcomes; (ironically) worse economic damage than countries which took draconian action; and (also ironically) continually recurring restrictions as a result of earlier failure to take strong action to suppress Covid and keep it at bay. Public reaction in England (unlike in Scotland and Wales) to the Johnson government's shenanigans has not been commensurate with that government's level of failure, which sadly reflects a debasement of the political culture in England.

Infected blood scandal: "Chilling" cover up hid truth for decades, public inquiry finds

The Infected Blood Inquiry: we need some honesty and engagement by those in authority

The voices of those affected by the infected blood tragedy were silenced for too long

Infected blood inquiry: justice will only be delivered when all the recommendations are acted upon

How the Message from Mortality Figures Was Missed at Mid Staffs

Modelling hepatitis C infection acquired from blood transfusions in the UK between 1970 and 1991 for the Infected Blood Inquiry

How Cure the NHS Became the True Professionals at Mid Staffs.

Did the Government Ignore Criticisms of the NHSin the Run Up to the Mid Staffs Scandal?

Protecting Blood Supplies

How do we conduct a national transfusion related lookback program?

Details of French Trial Must Be Released Urgently, Say UK Experts

Italian Surgeon Should Never Have Been Hired by Karolinska, Inquiry Concludes

Covid inquiry: communication failures impeded the UK's pandemic response

'We did everything we could': An account of toxic leadership

Government criticised over failure to implement patient safety recommendations

Houston transplant programme halted amid allegations that surgeon in charge secretly made patients ineligible

Two sides to every story: Reappraising the early history of liver transplantation at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge

What we did not learn at the covid inquiry in Scotland: a gap analysis

Mitigating the impact of blood shortages in England

Mixed messages, broken trust, avoidable deaths: A critical appraisal of the UK government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic

"Hyped" papers by disgraced Karolinska surgeon should be retracted, says ethics board.