Abstract:Since scholarly interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR) has primarily focused on the synergies between social and economic performance, our understanding of how (and the conditions under which) companies use CSR to produce policy outcomes that work against public welfare has remained comparatively underdeveloped. In particular, little is known about how corporate decision-makers privately reconcile the conflicts between public and private interests, even though this is likely to be relevant to understanding the limitations of CSR as a means of aligning business activity with the broader public interest. This study addresses this issue using internal tobacco industry documents to explore British-American Tobacco’s (BAT) thinking on CSR and its effects on the company’s CSR Programme. The article presents a three-stage model of CSR development, based on Sykes and Matza’s theory of techniques of neutralization, which links together: how BAT managers made sense of the company’s declining political authority in the mid-1990s; how they subsequently justified the use of CSR as a tool of stakeholder management aimed at diffusing the political impact of public health advocates by breaking up political constituencies working towards evidence-based tobacco regulation; and how CSR works ideologically to shape stakeholders’ perceptions of the relative merits of competing approaches to tobacco control. Our analysis has three implications for research and practice. First, it underlines the importance of approaching corporate managers’ public comments on CSR critically and situating them in their economic, political and historical contexts. Second, it illustrates the importance of focusing on the political aims and effects of CSR. Third, by showing how CSR practices are used to stymie evidence-based government regulation, the article underlines the importance of highlighting and developing matrices to assess the negative social impacts of CSR.

What Lies Beneath: Organisational Responses to Powerful Stakeholders

Making Organizations More Inclusive: The Work of Belonging

Imagining beyond nature-culture dualism: An exploration of ecological justice

An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation

Participating By Choice or Command? When Ideals of Stakeholder Engagement Clash With a Prevailing Strategy Discourse

Organizational Legitimacy

Expanding understanding of brand value co-creation on social media from an S-D logic perspective: Introducing structuration theory

Corporate Social Responsibility, Benefits beyond Legitimacy: A Symbiotic Framework

Organizational Structure from Interaction: Evidence from Corporate Sustainability Efforts

Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world

For the Love of the Game: Moral Ambivalence and Justification Work in Consuming Violence

The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR

WHERE DO STAKEHOLDERS COME FROM?: RESPONSE TO BROWN AND BYLUND https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0503

The practices of artist-entrepreneurs located outside Canada's creative hubs viewed through the lens of the pragmatic sociology of critique

The Firm as a Subsociety: Purpose, Justice, and the Theory of the Firm

Contesting Neoliberal Reform of Statutory Social Work in Switzerland and England: Discretionary Spaces, Collective Resistance and Ethico-Political Professionalism

Institutional Hegemony of a Logic Within a Cross-Sector Partnership

On the Role of Institutional Logics in Legitimacy Evaluations: The Effects of Pricing and CSR Signals on Organizational Legitimacy

Institutional Translation through Spectatorship: Collective Consumption and Editing of Symbolic Organizational Texts by Firms and their Audiences

An Unexpected Means Of Embedding Ethics In Organizations: Preliminary Findings From Values-Based Evaluations

“And Who Are You?”: A Performative Perspective on Authority in Organizations