WHERE DO STAKEHOLDERS COME FROM?: RESPONSE TO BROWN AND BYLUND https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0503

Sybille Sachs,Sharon Alvarez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0328

IF: 16.4

2022-10-29

Academy of Management Review

Abstract:Academy of Management Review, Volume 0, Issue ja, -Not available-.

management,business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Stakeholder Management: a Business Philosophy in the Era of New Economy

贾生华,陈宏辉

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8409.2003.01.010

2003-01-01

Soft Science

Abstract:Shareholder -supremacies are the core of corporate governance in Anglo-Saxon system.Some management paradoxes emerged because this thought has been neglecting the stakeholders' claims.The stakeholder theory,however,argues that whether or not a firm can survive and develop depends on how effectively it deals with various stakeholders,among which shareholder is just one.In the era of new economy characterized by knowledge,information and globalization,the stakeholders' participation determines the corporate performance.In this context,it is argued that enterprises should abandon shareholder -supremacies,focus on fostering and developing human capital value of employees,and satisfy stakeholders' interests appropriately.
Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past, present, and future

Flore Bridoux,JW Stoelhorst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221127628

2022-10-17

Strategic Organization

Abstract:Strategic Organization, Ahead of Print. We reflect on the past, present, and future of stakeholder theory, focusing on its link to strategy and organization scholarship. Stakeholder theory was originally conceived as a theory of strategic management, but for most of its history it largely developed without having a noticeable impact on strategy research. This has changed in the past decade, however, with the strategy field making a "stakeholder turn." We highlight the streams of research at the forefront of this turn, including work on "behavioral stakeholder theory," 'stakeholder strategy theory,' and "stakeholder governance." We conclude with an outlook on how stakeholder theory can help strategy scholars develop a theory of managing value creation that explicitly acknowledges both the economic and moral nature of relationships in and around organizations.

management,business
Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future

Johanna Kujala,Sybille Sachs,Heta Leinonen,Anna Heikkinen,Daniel Laude

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595

2022-01-06

Abstract:Stakeholder engagement has grown into a widely used yet often unclear construct in business and society research. The literature lacks a unified understanding of the essentials of stakeholder engagement, and the fragmented use of the stakeholder engagement construct challenges its development and legitimacy. The purpose of this article is to clarify the construct of stakeholder engagement to unfold the full potential of stakeholder engagement research. We conduct a literature review on 90 articles in leading academic journals focusing on stakeholder engagement in the business and society, management and strategy, and environmental management and environmental policy literatures. We present a descriptive analysis of stakeholder engagement research for a 15-year period, and we identify the moral, strategic, and pragmatic components of stakeholder engagement as well as its aims, activities, and impacts. Moreover, we offer an inclusive stakeholder engagement definition and provide a guide to organizing the research. Finally, we complement the current understanding with a largely overlooked dark side of stakeholder engagement. We conclude with future research avenues for stakeholder engagement research.

business
The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research

Gaizka Ormazábal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000053

2018-01-01

Foundations and Trends® in Accounting

Abstract:I review the empirical research on the role of stakeholders in corporate governance with an emphasis in contributions from the accounting literature. In particular, I focus on the following stakeholders: employees, the general public, the media, related firms, the government, private regulators, gatekeepers, and foreigners. This list does not include capital providers (shareholders and debt-holders), as the governance role of these stakeholders has already been covered by prior surveys in the academic literature. The discussion is structured around each stakeholder's incentives to influence managerial behavior, the mechanisms through which stakeholders act on managerial actions, as well as any concerns about this influence. All the analyzed stakeholders appear capable of influencing managerial actions to some extent, but the efficacy of stakeholders' monitoring role is controversial. Empirical research uncovers several factors that undermine stakeholders' incentives to discipline corporate managers. And more critically, in some cases stakeholders' incentives appear to be misaligned not only with shareholders' interests but also with the public interest. Taken together, the reviewed evidence suggests that the monitoring role involves a wide range of actors beyond the board of directors and capital providers. The review also points out that there is still much to learn about stakeholder monitoring.
A Stakeholder Perspective: Origins and Core Concepts

Pernille Eskerod

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.3

2020-06-30

Abstract:Organizations (whether they are permanent or temporary) have stakeholders, that is, individuals and groups that can affect or be affected by the organization’s activities and achievements. Assuming that the fundamental driver of value creation is stakeholder relationships, managing those relationships well is a prerequisite for obtaining and sustaining success in all businesses, regardless of the success measures applied. Therefore, applying a stakeholder perspective is of significant importance for any manager or entrepreneur. However, the essentials as well as the implications of applying such a perspective are not clear. Researchers and practitioners have offered many contributions, however, the existing literature is inconclusive. To provide clarity, stakeholder concepts (e.g. stakeholder definition, systems perspective, separation thesis, stakeholder analysis, stakeholder engagement, perception of fairness, stakeholder utility function, stakeholder salience, stakeholder disaggregation, stakeholder multiplicity, managing for stakeholders, Value Creation Stakeholder Theory, value destruction, shadows of the context) are defined and 15 propositions for further inquiry are offered. The Scandinavian and American origins of stakeholder thinking are presented. The propositions are intended to invite discussion—and could form the basis for future research questions as well as provide guidance for managers. By drawing on (a) Professor Eric Rhenman, who in the 1960s first proposed an explicit theoretical framework on stakeholder thinking; (b) Professor R. Edward Freeman, who has been the most influential contributor to the field; and (c) additional, selected contributions, the aim is to providevalue for both new and seasoned researchers as well as for managers, consultants, and educators. In order to give the reader the opportunity to self-assess and interpret the “raw data,” the text is rich on citations.
What Lies Beneath: Organisational Responses to Powerful Stakeholders

Fabiola Alvarez,Dimitrinka Stoyanova Russell,Barbara Townley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221103955

2022-08-13

Sociology

Abstract:Sociology, Ahead of Print. This article takes recourse to a particular branch of French Pragmatic Sociology, namely, Boltanski and Thévenot's 'orders of worth' paradigm, as a lens through which to both explore the misalignment between espoused values and retrospective discourses and illustrate the underlying motivations behind decision making in an organisation within the creative industries sector. By virtue of its contributions at the organisational, social and sectorial levels, our study contributes to extant debates pertaining to individual agency versus structural constraints as well as demonstrating the heterogeneity of modes of formal compliance to wider institutionalised legitimacy. In so doing, it builds upon recent work that seeks to broaden the notion of value in the creative industries, while, simultaneously, calling for greater heterogeneity in policy making in the sector through an ongoing process of 'creative conflict'.
Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021

Arelys López‐Concepción,Ana I. Gil‐Lacruz,Isabel Saz‐Gil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2170

2021-07-08

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Abstract:The conceptualization of the stakeholders of the companies for the fulfillment of the objectives of sustainable development is controversial, even more so, if it is approached from the perspective of corporate social responsibility and the psychology of the employees and their behavior. The existing literature and knowledge on the relationship among the stakeholder approach, corporate social responsibility and the achievement of the SDGs remain unstructured and fragmented. The objective of the manuscript is to identify and systematize scientific research on the stakeholder approach with respect to corporate social responsibility, in order to achieve business sustainability, in response to sustainable development goals and from the perspective of the well-being of workers. Our main contribution to the literature review is to focus on all these issues together, and not in isolation. A systematic literature search is conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA). The approaches, issues and methodologies that predominate in the academic field in the last 5 years (2015–2021) were analyzed. Based on this review, we define a research agenda that synthesizes key trends and promising lines of research for further advancement of theoretical and empirical knowledge on the relationship among stakeholders, corporate social responsibility, and human resource management.

management,business,environmental studies
Stakeholders' Responses to CSR Tradeoffs: When Other-Orientation and Trust Trump Material Self-Interest

Flore Bridoux,Nicole Stofberg,Deanne Den Hartog

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01992

2016-01-14

Abstract:When investing in corporate social responsibility (CSR), managers may strive for a win-win scenario where all stakeholders end up better off, but they may not always be able to avoid trading off stakeholders' interests. To provide guidance to managers who have to make tradeoffs, this study used a vignette-based experiment to explore stakeholders' intention to associate with a firm (i.e., buy from or become an employee) that trades off CSR directed at the stakeholders' own group (self-directed CSR) and CSR directed at another stakeholder group (other-directed CSR). Results show that stakeholders were not systematically more attracted to a firm that favors their own group over another stakeholder group. Specifically, stakeholders' other-orientation moderated their reaction to tradeoffs: stakeholders higher on other-orientation were willing to forego some material benefits to associate with a firm that treated suppliers in developing countries significantly better than its competitors, whereas stakeholders lower on other-orientation were more attracted to a firm favoring their own stakeholder group. Other-orientation also moderated reactions to tradeoffs involving the environment, although high CSR directed at the environment did not compensate for low self-directed CSR even for stakeholders higher on other-orientation. Second, the vignette study showed that trust mediated the relationship between tradeoffs and stakeholders' reactions. The study contributes first and foremost to the burgeoning literature on CSR tradeoffs and to the multimotive approach to CSR, which claims that other motives can drive stakeholders' reactions to CSR in addition to self-interest. First, it provides further evidence that studying CSR tradeoffs is important to understand both (prospective) employees' and customers' reactions to CSR-related activities. Second, it identifies other-orientation as a motive-related individual difference that explains heterogeneity in stakeholders' reactions to CSR. These findings suggest several avenues for future research for organizational psychologists interested in organizational justice. Third, it investigates trust as a mediating mechanism. Fourth, it reveals differences in stakeholders' reactions depending on which other stakeholder group is involved in the tradeoff. For practice, the findings suggest that tradeoffs are important because they influence which stakeholders are attracted to the firm.
Analysis of How Firms Come into Being and Their Boundary from the Stakeholder's Viewpoint

Youwei Du

2012-01-01

Abstract:The firm is viewed as the result of collective choices in this paper,which are decided by two levels of collective choices.At the first level,all potential stakeholders make their choices of firm contracts or transactional contracts.The selectors of firm contracts will construct and own the firm.And the selectors of transactional contracts will decide the business model of the firm.At the second level,the stakeholders who own the firm will make their choices of the control rights and residual income allocation of the firm.The feasible set of the second level is the constraint condition of the individual reason of the first level choices.The paper derives the feasible set and the protocol set of the second level by means of inequalities deduction.Based on the analysis of the logic of how firms come into being,the paper discusses the ownership boundary and operation boundary with examples in reality.To sum up,the paper brings forward the stakeholders' selective view of firm theory.And the application of this view is prospected in the end.
Corporate stakeholders, corporate valuation and ESG

Bradford Cornell,Alan C. Shapiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12299

IF: 2.295

2020-12-14

European Financial Management

Abstract:In addition to explicit contracts, corporations issue their stakeholders implicit claims, including fair treatment of employees and the promise of continuing service to customers.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

business, finance
An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation

Christine Vallaster,Sylvia von Wallpach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.012

IF: 11.3

2013-09-01

Journal of Business Research

Abstract:Brand research increasingly recognizes the active role of multiple stakeholders in co-creating brand meaning and the importance of new social media supporting stakeholders in their co-creation efforts. However, empirical insights into the social process of online multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation are so far missing. This study contributes to existing research by illuminating the social dynamics that characterize multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation in a virtual environment. The authors undertake an online discursive inquiry focusing on stakeholders’ textual interactions regarding the UK Gate Gourmet brand crisis. The empirical study aggregates online stakeholder texts to illustrate (a) relationships between salient stakeholders and (b) discursive strategies and resources stakeholders apply to co-create brand meaning. The article concludes that brand meaning results from simultaneous interactions between interdependent stakeholders in a network (termed multi-log). Successfully managing brands requires management's active engagement in this multi-log.

business
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts

Ronald K. Mitchell,D. Wood,Bradley R. Agle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105

1997-10-01

Abstract:Stakeholder theory has been a popular heuristic for describing the management environment for years, but it has not attained full theoretical status. Our aim in this article is to contribute to a theory of stakeholder identification and salience based on stakeholders possessing one or more of three relationship attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. By combining these attributes, we generate a typology of stakeholders, propositions concerning their salience to managers of the firm, and research and management implications.

Sociology,Business
Unpacking the Mechanism by which Corporate Responsibility Impacts Stakeholder Relationships

Carola Hillenbrand,Kevin Money,Abby Ghobadian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00794.x

IF: 5.6

2011-11-28

British Journal of Management

Abstract:Most research on corporate responsibility (CR) has investigated CR from the perspective of organizations, often focusing on how organizations define, manage and implement CR to gain benefits or competitive advantage. The benefits of CR for organizations are, however, often said to be achieved through increased support of stakeholders. Despite this, limited attention has been given to understanding CR from the perspective of stakeholders and, in particular, the mechanism by which CR drives stakeholder support. This study addresses this deficit. Building on advances in the application of psychological theories to the field of management, the research develops and empirically tests a theoretical model of how CR‐related experiences and beliefs drive stakeholder trust and positive intent. The research is conducted with customers (n = 708) and employees (n = 359) of a service organization in the UK that introduced a range of CR‐related activities into their business. The findings contribute to literature by empirically demonstrating (a) the impact of CR‐related experiences on the development of beliefs about, and trust towards, the organization; (b) the importance of ‘others‐related’ CR experiences even in the presence of ‘self‐related’ CR experiences; and (c) the role of beliefs as partial mediators in how experiences of CR, both ‘self‐related’ and ‘others‐related’, translate into trust and positive intent.

management,business
Responding to Diffused Stakeholders on Social Media: Connective Power and Firm Reactions to CSR-Related Twitter Messages

Saxton Gregory D.,Ren Charlotte,Guo Chao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04472-x

IF: 6.331

2020-01-01

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:Social media offers a platform for diffused stakeholders to interact with firms-alternatively praising, questioning, and chastising businesses for their CSR performance and seeking to engage in two-way dialogue. In 2014, 163,402 public messages were sent to Fortune 200 firms' CSR-focused Twitter accounts, each of which was either shared, replied to, "liked," or ignored by the targeted firm. This paper examines firm reactions to these messages, building a model of firm response to stakeholders that combines the notions of CSR communication and stakeholder salience. Our findings show that firm response to a stakeholder on social media is positively and most significantly associated with what we refer to as the stakeholder's connective power but negatively associated with the firm's own connective power. To a lesser extent, firm response is positively associated with the stakeholder's normative power but negatively associated with the firm's own normative power. Firm response is also shown to be positively associated with stakeholder urgency in terms of both the originality of a stakeholder message and the expression of positive sentiment.
Between Sweet Harmony and a Clash of Cultures: Does a Joint Academic–Practitioner Review Reconcile Rigor and Relevance?

Alexander T. Nicolai,Ann-Christine Schulz,Markus Göbel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310390866

2010-12-28

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Abstract:A substantial body of literature discusses the so-called rigor—relevance gap in management science and possible ways of overcoming it. A frequently advocated approach, in line with Gibbons, Limoges, Nowotny, Schwartz, and Trow’s “Mode 2” idea of creating “hybrid fora,” is the introduction of joint academic—practitioner review processes in management journals. In an empirical case study of one of the oldest management journals in the world, the authors show that the demands of academic and practitioner reviewers are hardly compatible, and, to some extent, inversely correlated. In contrast to other studies, here the authors show that the reason for the tension between academics and practitioners with regard to this issue does not lie in differences in the evaluation criteria of each group. Rather, the different worldviews of academics and practitioners lead to different interpretations of these criteria and a striking incongruence between the two groups’ ideas of practical relevance.
New Perspectives on International Public Relations: Engaging Foreign Stakeholders

Guy J. Golan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219835256

2019-03-25

American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract:American Behavioral Scientist, Ahead of Print.
Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world

Mark S. Reed,Bethann Garramon Merkle,Elizabeth J. Cook,Caitlin Hafferty,Adam P. Hejnowicz,Richard Holliman,Ian D. Marder,Ursula Pool,Christopher M. Raymond,Kenneth E. Wallen,David Whyte,Marta Ballesteros,Sadiq Bhanbhro,Siniša Borota,Marnie L. Brennan,Esther Carmen,Elaine A. Conway,Rosie Everett,Fiona Armstrong-Gibbs,Eric Jensen,Gerbrand Koren,Jenny Lockett,Pedi Obani,Seb O’Connor,Laurie Prange,Jon Mason,Simon Robinson,Priya Shukla,Anna Tarrant,Alessandro Marchetti,Mascha Stroobant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4

IF: 6

2024-05-01

Sustainability Science

Abstract:Language matters in shaping perceptions and guiding behaviour. The term stakeholder is widely used, yet little attention is paid to the possibility that its use may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. In this article, we critically examine the limitations of the stakeholder concept and its ambiguity, normativity, and exclusionary implications. We emphasise the importance of using language that gives a voice to marginalised groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful and reflexive participation in decision-making processes. In critiquing the use of the term and calling for alternative practices, we aim to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Therefore, rather than advocating a single alternative term, we suggest a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
Participating By Choice or Command? When Ideals of Stakeholder Engagement Clash With a Prevailing Strategy Discourse

Heli Pietilä,Sari Laari-Salmela,Vesa Puhakka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503241255484

2024-06-12

Business & Society

Abstract:Business &Society, Ahead of Print. Extant studies on stakeholder engagement have noted the inherent tensions arising from participation efforts, giving rise to the dark side of engagement. However, few studies have focused on organizational power relations that provide specific conditions for engagement and the related paradox that control represents. Drawing on strategy discourse and paradox as theoretical lenses, we examine engagement as a nexus of observed societal expectations, subjectivities provided by the strategy discourse, and the subject positions adopted by the individuals, giving rise to a contradiction between openness and control. As a result, we present three modes of participation: inclusion, admittance, and quasi-participation. We contribute to stakeholder engagement and paradox literature by outlining the "engagement-control paradox" and showing how the prevailing strategy discourse may drive the use of participation as a form of control. Maintaining different modes of participation introduces inadvertent closure for participation and hinders strategy-making and the development of the organization.

business
10.5840/jbee20118111

Morris G. Danielson,Amy F. Lipton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jbee20118111

2000-01-01

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs

Abstract:This paper presents a short classroom exercise to stimulate student discussion about the rights of shareholders versus the rights of stakeholders. Students are challenged to identify and evaluate their preconceived notions of what constitutes excessive profits. The exercise illustrates why the realization of a large return on investment cannot be used as prima facie evidence that a firm exploited employees, customers, or other stakeholders. This concept is illustrated using datafrom the pharmaceutical industry.
Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect

Jose‐Manuel Prado‐Lorenzo,Isabel Gallego‐Alvarez,Isabel M. Garcia‐Sanchez,Jose-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo,Isabel Gallego-Alvarez,Isabel M. Garcia-Sanchez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.189

2009-03-01

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Abstract:Social disclosure, according to Ullmann's conceptual framework (1985), could be explained by stakeholder power, strategic posture and economic performance, where the power of stakeholders is a function of the resources they control that are essential to the company. The aim of this work is to test the effect that shareholder power and dispersed ownership structure have on the decision to disclose corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in the Spanish context, controlling for the rest of the dimensions. Our results allow us to affirm that this paper tests a stakeholder theory approach to analyzing corporate social disclosures and is consistent with the framework proposed, although the power of shareholders is quite limited. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

management,business,environmental studies

WHERE DO STAKEHOLDERS COME FROM?: RESPONSE TO BROWN AND BYLUND https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0503

Stakeholder Management: a Business Philosophy in the Era of New Economy

Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past, present, and future

Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future

The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research

A Stakeholder Perspective: Origins and Core Concepts

What Lies Beneath: Organisational Responses to Powerful Stakeholders

Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021

Stakeholders' Responses to CSR Tradeoffs: When Other-Orientation and Trust Trump Material Self-Interest

Analysis of How Firms Come into Being and Their Boundary from the Stakeholder's Viewpoint

Corporate stakeholders, corporate valuation and ESG

An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation

Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts

Unpacking the Mechanism by which Corporate Responsibility Impacts Stakeholder Relationships

Responding to Diffused Stakeholders on Social Media: Connective Power and Firm Reactions to CSR-Related Twitter Messages

Between Sweet Harmony and a Clash of Cultures: Does a Joint Academic–Practitioner Review Reconcile Rigor and Relevance?

New Perspectives on International Public Relations: Engaging Foreign Stakeholders

Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world

Participating By Choice or Command? When Ideals of Stakeholder Engagement Clash With a Prevailing Strategy Discourse

10.5840/jbee20118111

Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect