Abstract:Research summary: Building on the comparative capitalism’s notion of institutional complementarities, we examine whether firms’ simultaneous adoption of managerial entrenchment provisions (MEPs) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities reinforces or undercuts one another in influencing firm financial performance. We propose that the financial impact of such configurations is contingent on the country’s institutional setting. In Liberal Market Economies (LMEs), where firms face strong pressures to achieve short-term goals, the combination of MEPs and CSR creates shareholder value, particularly when firms engage in internally-oriented CSR projects. Conversely, in Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs), where institutions already curb short-term demands, the combined adoption of MEPs and CSR initiatives destroys shareholder value, particularly when this CSR is external. Overall, our study enhances understanding about the institutional complementarity between corporate governance and CSR.Managerial summary: This study examines how two organizational practices, managerial entrenchment provisions (MEPs) and corporate social responsibility (CSR), combine between them to improve or reduce firms’ financial success. Our analysis demonstrates that institutional framework has a strong influence on their combined effect. When the institutional context supports solutions to coordination problems among economic agents through market-based arrangements, MEPs allow the implementation of strategies directed to promote long-term investments and relationships. In this case, MEPs when paired with CSR allow generating intangibles that contribute to create shareholder value. Contrarily, in frameworks with coordination mechanisms based on non-market arrangements, the joint adoption of MEPs and CSR destroys value by increasing the power of managers and blockholders to extract rents at the expense of firms’ minority shareholders.

10.5840/jbee20118111

Stakeholder Management: a Business Philosophy in the Era of New Economy

The Case for Maximizing Long‐Run Shareholder Value

Profit or Legitimacy? What Drives Firms to Prioritize Social Stakeholders?

The Shared Cost of Pursuing Shareholder Value

Corporate stakeholders, corporate valuation and ESG

Large Shareholder Participation Behaviors, Managers' Risk-Taking and Firm Innovation Performance: A Shareholder Activism Perspective

Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value

Social Responsibility and Corporate Profits: The Expense Preference Approach

Enlightened Corporate Governance: Specific Investments by Employees as Legitimation for Residual Claims

How Does the Stock Market Value Corporate Social Performance? When Behavioral Theories Interact with Stakeholder Theory

On a Stakeholder Model of Corporate Governance

Stakeholder Engagement, Knowledge Problems and Ethical Challenges

Does Equity Ownership Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? A Literature Review of Theories and Recent Empirical Findings

Sustainable Strategies: Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility for Enlightened Self-Interest

Investment Strategies and Corporate Behaviour with Socially Responsible Investors: A Theory of Active Ownership

Big Profits, Big Harm? Exploring the Link Between Firm Financial Performance and Human Rights Misbehavior

Is Managerial Entrenchment Always Bad and Corporate Social Responsibility Always Good? A Cross-National Examination of Their Combined Influence on Shareholder Value

Shareholder Politics: The Influence of Investors' Political Affiliations on Corporate Social Responsibility

The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique

Does shareholder litigation risk promote or hinder corporate social responsibility? A quasi‐natural experiment