Abstract:Thirty years of initiatives have resulted in only partial achievement of the regeneration of Britain's manufacturing cities hard hit by deindustrialization. City centres and waterside districts have been regenerated, but much poor-quality housing and derelict land remains. Unmet social needs in inner cities are characterized by up to one-third of residents living in poverty, 40% male unemployment rates, and some households into a third generation of lifelong unemployment. It is for these reasons that the government recently established a high-profile Urban Task Force, headed by the architect Lord (Richard) Rogers. The task force confirmed what many regeneration practitioners and inner-city residents knew: that while the nation has become better at property-led regeneration, it has not cracked the hard nut of helping households disadvantaged by long-term unemployment or the inability to work. Almost all regeneration initiatives in Britain are now predicated on partnership between local government, business and voluntary organizations. There are at least 700 such urban partnerships, with as many as 75 operating in a single city at sub-regional, city-wide and neighbourhood levels. As the main organizational vehicle for regeneration, the effectiveness of these partnerships has become a factor in the achievement of the nations' urban policy objectives. The rise of partnership in Britain mirrors a broader concern around the world for government to work with civil society in the challenging task of urban governance. The findings of a study of 27 regeneration partnerships in nine city-region 'clusters' in England, Scotland and Wales are summarized. The findings include factors which directly influence the effectiveness of partnerships, and a group of governance factors. These influence partnership and regeneration outcomes, but are outside of the control of partnerships. They are as follows: the modernization of British local government, an emerging regional development framework and the need for effective national policy.

Levelling up policies and the failure to learn

England's Catch-22: Institutional Limitations to Achieving Balanced Growth Through Devolution

Mechanisms of Metagovernance As Structural Challenges to Levelling Up in England

Spatial division of opportunity: local economic context, elite trajectories, and the widening participation industry

Challenges to Levelling Up: Post-COVID precarity in “left behind” Stoke-on-Trent

Threshold regressions for more objective urban and regional policies

Quantitative analysis at local and national level: getting it right and why it matters

Assessing the role of universities in a place-based Industrial Strategy: Evidence from the UK

Ensuring Skills Are Available in the Right Locations: Are We There Yet? A Regional Analysis of Qualification Gaps

Evolutionary Complexity Geography and the Future of Regional Innovation and Growth Policies

Decentralising the United Kingdom: the Northern Powerhouse strategy and urban ownership links between firms since 2010

The unfairness of place: A cultural history of the UK's 'postcode lottery'

Place-based industrial and regional strategy – levelling the playing field

Include Us Out—Economic Development and Social Policy in the Creative Industries

City deals, decentralisation and the governance of local infrastructure funding and financing in the UK

England's Qualifications Gap and Its Solutions: Evidence from the West Midlands

Regional Productivity Differences, Skills and Inclusive Growth: Survey Findings

Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: Challenges of a place-blind policy mix

Local industrial strategy and skills policy in England: Assessing the linkages and limitations – a case study of the Sheffield City Deal

Urban Partnerships, Governance and the Regeneration of Britain's Cities

The Measurement of Intra-Distributional Mobility: An Investigation of District Long-Term Housing Vacancies