Abstract:This study examines the perceptions of individual academics about performance management systems (PMS) developed by an Australian university to meet government research assessment requirements. Using a case study method, the research examines the period 2006–2010 within a university, relying on academics’ responses to a survey on the effect of research PMS, contextualised with publicly available organisational documents. The case study university performed well in the Australian Government's first research assessment exercise, Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) 2010. However, academics reported increasing levels of stress and decreasing job satisfaction, consistent with research that identifies the commodification of academic research. This process of commodification has occurred as a result of the implementation of PMS designed to assess academics’ research‐focused performance and thereby strengthen the university's performance under ERA. In investigating in detail the responses of individual academics to Australia's research assessment initiative, the paper reveals a disconnect between the macro‐institutional demands placed on the higher education sector, university changes made to accommodate these demands, and the ability of academics to meet these demands in a sustainable way. The paper examines the perceptions of individual academics about performance management systems developed by an Australian university from 2006‐2010 to meet government research assessment requirements. The case study university performed well in the Australian Government's first research assessment exercise, Excellence in Research for Australia 2010. However, academics reported increasing levels of stress and decreasing job satisfaction, consistent with research that identifies the commodification of academic research.

Fast and Loose: An Evaluation of the PricewaterhouseCoopers Report Marriage Equality in Australia

Explaining voting in the 2017 Australian same-sex marriage plebiscite

Justice, Labor, Research, and Power: The Significance and Implications of Parent-Reported Outcomes in Medical-Legal Partnership

Left on the shelf: Explaining the failure of public inquiry recommendations

Female Board Representation and Corporate Performance: A Review and New Estimates for Australia

The role, costs and value for money of external consultancies in the health sector: A study of New Zealand's District Health Boards

Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction

Do LGBT-supportive corporate policies enhance firm performance?

Beyond "make" or "buy": Evaluating value‐for‐money in public service delivery

"Profits before people"? A systematic review of the health and safety impacts of privatising public utilities and industries in developed countries

Analysis of Alcohol Industry Submissions against Marketing Regulation

The political origins of corporate transparency: forging strange coalitions through information rules and policy entrepreneurship

Privatisation of government services in Australia: what is known about health and equity impacts

Welfare and economic impacts of Fair Pay Agreements in Aotearoa

Auditor and auditee engagement with public sector performance audit: An institutional logics perspective

Moral evaluation in critical discourse analysis

PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: LEGITIMISING GOVERNMENT POLICIES OR PROVIDING INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT?

Accounting for Research: Academic Responses to Research Performance Demands in an Australian University

Patterns of Governance: The Curious Case of Non‐profit Community Services in Australia

Pay Transparency, Information Access Rights and Data Protection Law: Exploring Viable Alternatives to Disclosure Orders in Equal Pay Litigation

Competition, scandal, or ideology? A congruence analysis of Australian political finance reforms (1980–2020)