Abstract:Purpose More companies embrace flexible work arrangements (FWA) as one of their employee retention strategies, yet its effectiveness is not consistent. Generally, past researchers use the social exchange theory to explain how FWA lowers turnover intention, while the rest adopts the border theory to justify why FWA can be ineffective. Here, the authors compare the competing theories for the first time to differentiate the theoretical reasoning of three forms of FWA (flex time, flex leave and homeworking). Two mediators (organisational commitment and work−family conflicts) are chosen to represent the mechanism of each theory. Design/methodology/approach The authors employ the latest wave of the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) Work Orientation Module from 2015. Based on nationally representative data from 35 nations and 17,604 participants, the authors employed simple mediation and parallel double-mediation models via bootstrapping procedures to investigate the theoretical reasoning behind each FWA. Findings The results indicate that organisational commitment and work−family conflicts as significant mediators in all models, supporting both theories. The authors first tested each mediator in separated models. In models concerning the social exchange theory, all FWA lead to increased organisational commitment before lowering turnover intention, implying the beneficial outcomes of FWA. However, findings also support the border theory's perspective where flex time and homeworking increase turnover intention through heightened work−family conflicts. The parallel double-mediation further suggests that all three FWA forms have their unique theoretical framework, impacting turnover intention differently. Originality/value Both the social exchange theory and border theory are well-developed theories but grounded on different theoretical reasoning. This is the first paper that compares both theoretical perspectives in the context of FWA. It offers a new perspective in explaining the inconclusive effectiveness of FWA and provides future researchers a more integrated interpretation and prediction of FWA's impact on turnover intention.

Welfare and economic impacts of Fair Pay Agreements in Aotearoa

EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE——Based on Multinational Panel Data Analysis

Public Policy Induced Changes in Employment: Valuation Issues for Benefit-Cost Analysis

Statutory minimum wage in Hong Kong: a family impact analysis

The major parties: National’s and Labour’s employment relations policies

Hours of work and the long‐run effects of in‐work transfers

Employer vs government parental leave: Labour market effects

Does flexible work arrangements decrease or increase turnover intention? A comparison between the social exchange theory and border theory

Welfare Effects of Labor Income Tax Changes on Married Couples: A Sufficient Statistics Approach

“Jobsback” and the Future of Wages Policy

Impacts of deep trade agreements on trade and welfare – An application to China joining the RCEP and CPTPP

Wages Policy and the 1991 National Wage Case: An Economic Perspective

The positive relationship between female employment and fertility rates: The role of family benefits expenditure and gender-role ideologies

Female Labor Supply, Human Capital and Welfare Reform

HOUSEHOLD BARGAINING OVER WEALTH AND THE ADEQUACY OF WOMEN'S RETIREMENT INCOMES IN NEW ZEALAND

The impact of the overtime policy reform–evidence from the low-paid workers in Taiwan

The labor market impacts of America's first paid maternity leave policy

Implications for Wages Policy in Australia of the Living Wage Case

The Unequal Distribution of Consequences of Contracting Out: Female, Low-skilled, and Young Workers Pay the Highest Price

Impact of enforcing a statutory minimum wage on work and quality of life of vulnerable groups in Hong Kong

Climate Policies, Labor Markets, and Macroeconomic Outcomes in Emerging Economies