AN ANALYSIS OF US HOUSEHOLD SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILES BASED ON MARITAL STATUS AND GENDER
Sumaria Mohan-Neill,Indira Neill Hoch,Meng Li
2014-01-01
Abstract:ABSTRACTPrevious studies have reported that there are significant differences in income and wealth based on marital status and marital history (Wilmoth & Koso, 2002; Gustman & Juster, 1995; Seigel, 1993; Holden & Kuo, 1996). This paper first examines the separate effects of marital status and gender on the socioeconomic profiles of US households, and then explores the combined effect of the interaction of gender and marital status on those profiles. As expected, the results show that married head of household (HH) families are financially better off than single HH families. However, when gender is introduced, it seems to subtract from the gains of marriage. A married female HH is significantly worse off than married male HH, and is closer to single female HH in income. Furthermore, married female HH has less net worth than single male HH. Single female HH group has lowest income and wealth of all groups and this group constitutes about 22.5% of all households. Single female HH is also the 2nd largest group with children in the US, and due to their relatively low economic resources, these households often struggle with reduced quality of life and educational opportunities. This toxic combination increases the risks of continued inequality and inter-generational propagation of poverty. The most interesting findings are the results of the OLS regression models. They show that while demographic variables such as gender and marital status have significant correlation with wage income, household income and net worth, they are considerably less significant than age and education. Finally, all the demographic correlates (age, education, gender, marital status, etc.) pale in comparison to the influence of wage income and household income on net worth. So, if one is interested in policy prescriptions, substantive analysis should consider all these variables in a real world context, and imagine the scenarios where it would be more effective to enact policy measures for helping with opportunity and inequality.INTRODUCTION AND SELECTED BACKGROUND LITERATUREWealth inequality in the US has been increasing in fits and starts since the 1930s and particularly since the 1980s (Wolff, 1992). Increasing wealth inequality in the United States is driven by the top tail of the distribution becoming increasingly wealthy, resulting in a long tail of those with low or negative wealth (Diaz-Gimenez, Glover & Rios-Rull, 2007). Americans desire less inequality than currently exists (Norton & Ariely, 2011). The social and political implications of wealth inequality extend beyond wealth accumulation (Neill Hoch & Mohan-Neill, 2013). Wolff (1998) argues that "in a representative democracy, the distribution of power is often related to the distribution of wealth." Likewise, social and political factors that contribute to the unequal distribution of income and wealth are varied and interlocking. For these reasons, it is important to understand the demographic populations that currently show signs of difficulty in accumulating wealth.Family structure has been shown to correlate with wealth. Married households, with or without children, are wealthier than single households (Diaz-Gimenez et al, 2007). Those married continuously are wealthier than those who have had a marriage dissolve, either by divorce or death (Wilmoth & Koso, 2002). Remarriage mitigates some of the losses accrued by marriage dissolution, but not all. Single individuals who have never married see less wealth accumulation than do those who have been married and reaped the benefits of pro-marriage policy for at least part of their lives. Cohabitation with a partner does not show similar benefits to marriage (Wilmoth & Koso, 2002). Cohabitating, non-married partners (also called Living with Partner or LWP) may share some expenses, but such sharing does not translate into increased wealth accumulation over time. Notably LWP cohabitation does not carry the same tax and policy advantages that marriage does. …