Comparison between static modulus of elasticity, non-destructive testing moduli of elasticity and stress-wave speed in white spruce and lodgepole pine wood

Cyriac S. Mvolo,James D. Stewart,Ahmed Koubaa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2021.1871949
2021-01-21
Wood Material Science and Engineering
Abstract:<span>Static bending tests to measure modulus of elasticity (MOE<sub>ST</sub>) or wood stiffness provide an indicator of the structural performance of a finished product. These tests are however, slow and expensive. Tests to measure MOE using non-destructive testing (NDT) provide alternatives to MOE<sub>ST</sub> tests; however, relationships between the different modes of measurement need to be established. Non-destructive testing MOE measured by two methods (SilviScan [MOE<sub>SS</sub>] and time of flight [MOE<sub>TOF</sub>]) have been compared with MOE<sub>ST</sub> for lodgepole pine and white spruce. The relationships between stress wave speed (SWS) and MOE<sub>ST</sub> have also been evaluated. Simple linear regressions of MOE<sub>SS</sub>, MOE<sub>TOF</sub>, and SWS had greater explanatory power (higher coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>)) than did multiple linear regressions including growth rate or other wood fibre attributes. Simple linear regression from MOE<sub>TOF</sub> and MOE<sub>SS</sub> on MOE<sub>ST</sub> had lower R<sup>2</sup> for lodgepole pine than for white spruce; however, the converse was true for SWS. SWS had the highest R<sup>2</sup> (89%) and MOE<sub>SS</sub> the lowest R<sup>2</sup> (47%) when regressed on MOE<sub>ST</sub> in lodgepole pine. The results were tool and species specific, suggesting that R<sup>2</sup> between MOE<sub>ST</sub> and non-destructive testing MOE values must be validated separately for each commercial tree species and for each measurement technique.</span>
materials science, paper & wood
What problem does this paper attempt to address?