Dissolution Kinetics of SiO2 in FeO–SiO2–V2O3–CaO–MnO–Cr2O3–TiO2 System with Different FeO Contents

Lingxi Zhang,Min Chen,Mingyuan Huang,Ning Wang,Cong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02214-6
2021-06-04
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">Photovoltaic cutting waste (PCW) is a promising pre-reductant for the enrichment of vanadium and the removal of iron from vanadium slag. However, the dissolution of SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> contained in PCW affects the kinetic conditions and composition of vanadium slag during silicothermic reduction. In the present work, the dissolution behavior of SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> was investigated from 1823 K to 1873 K under FeO concentrations of 37.0 to 11.8 wt pct in FeO–SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>–V<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub>–CaO–MnO–Cr<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">3</sub>–TiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> system, that is, the pre-reduction process of vanadium slag. The results show that SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> dissolution in vanadium slag with different FeO contents is a pure dissolution and diffusion process and that no compact product or residual layer is generated. The rate-controlling step of SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> dissolution is the diffusion process, and the main driving force of SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> dissolution is the concentration difference between the slag and the interface of spherical SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> particles. The chemical reaction rate constant and diffusion coefficient of SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> at 1873 K range from 1.60 × 10<sup class="a-plus-plus">−5</sup> to 6.78 × 10<sup class="a-plus-plus">−6</sup> m/s and 3.49 × 10<sup class="a-plus-plus">−8</sup> to 1.52 × 10<sup class="a-plus-plus">−8</sup> m<sup class="a-plus-plus">2</sup>/s, respectively. The dissolution activation energy of SiO<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub> increases from approximately 270.82 to 341.26 kJ/mol.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?