Abstract:Abstract In this study, we leveraged the high temporal resolution of EEG to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the flexible regulation of cognitive control that unfolds over different timescales. We measured behavioral and neural effects of color–word incongruency, as different groups of participants performed three different versions of color–word Stroop tasks in which the relative timing of the color and word features varied from trial to trial. For this purpose, we used a standard Stroop color identification task with equal congruent-to-incongruent proportions (50%/50%), along with two versions of the “Reverse Stroop” word identification tasks, for which we manipulated the incongruency proportion (50%/50% and 80%/20%). Two canonical ERP markers of neural processing of stimulus incongruency, the frontocentral negative polarity incongruency wave (NINC) and the late positive component (LPC), were evoked across the various conditions. Results indicated that color–word incongruency interacted with the relative feature timing, producing greater neural and behavioral effects when the task-irrelevant stimulus preceded the target, but still significant effects when it followed. Additionally, both behavioral and neural incongruency effects were reduced by nearly half in the word identification task (Reverse Stroop 50/50) relative to the color identification task (Stroop 50/50), with these effects essentially fully recovering when incongruent trials appeared only infrequently (Reverse Stroop 80/20). Across the conditions, NINC amplitudes closely paralleled RTs, indicating this component is sensitive to the overall level of stimulus conflict. In contrast, LPC amplitudes were largest with infrequent incongruent trials, suggesting a possible readjustment role when proactive control is reduced. These findings thus unveil distinct control mechanisms that unfold over time in response to conflicting stimulus input under different contexts.

Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.

A Review of the Research and Theories about Stroop Dilution Effect

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

The Influence Of Stimulant Material Category On The Stroop Dilution Effect

Response Modality and the Stroop Task

The Stroop effect and mental imagery

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks

On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm

Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Semantic Stroop interference is modulated by the availability of executive resources: Insights from delta-plot analyses and cognitive load manipulation

Priming the distractor can eliminate the Stroop interference effect

Temporal dynamics analysis reveals that concurrent working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping

The temporal dynamics of the Stroop effect from childhood to young and older adulthood

Interlinguistic conflict: Word–word Stroop with first and second language colour words

What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian metaanalysis

The contribution of difficulty of an irrelevant task to task conflict

Disentangling three different conflicts at non-response/semantic and response levels in a new stroop-matching task

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

The Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes in the Human Brain