Abstract:Abstract When different sources of sensory information suggest competing behavioral responses, the efficiency of decision-making is impaired. Prior work suggests that at least two mechanisms may play a role in mitigating this interference: using early selective attention to extract the most relevant sensory inputs to avoid conflict or increasing the efficiency of the executive control network to resolve conflict during post-perceptual processing. To test these alternatives, we combined a stimulus-frequency tagging technique with a classic color-word Stroop paradigm, where color-bar targets and letter-string distractors were simultaneously flickered at different frequencies. Using electroencephalography (EEG), we measured the quality of early sensory processing by assessing the amplitude of steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by the targets and distractors. We also measured the engagement of the executive control network by assessing changes in frontal theta (4-7Hz) and posterior alpha oscillations (8-14Hz). Counter to the ‘early selective sensory modulation’ account, the amplitude of the SSVEP response was not modulated by manipulations of color/word congruency, while the frontal theta activity increased and the posterior alpha activity decreased in response to conflict. Moreover, target-related SSVEP amplitude was not correlated with response times (RTs) and a higher (not lower) distractor-related SSVEP amplitude predicted faster RTs. On the other hand, the amplitude of the frontal theta and alpha activity was highly correlated with RTs, irrespective of conflict levels. Over all, these results highlight the dominant role of the executive control network in conflict resolution during post-perceptual processing. Significance Statement Conflicting information interferes with decision-making. However, this interference can be mitigated either by extracting the most relevant inputs during early sensory processing or by increasing the efficiency of the executive control processes to resolve conflict. By measuring electroencephalography (EEG) in humans performing a modified color-word Stroop task, we examined early sensory responses evoked by targets and distractors while simultaneously monitoring frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations to index the activation of the executive control network. We found evidence that the executive control network played a more prominent role in resolving conflict.

The contribution of difficulty of an irrelevant task to task conflict

Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review

Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?

The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task

When conflict cannot be avoided: executive control dominates early selective sensory modulations during cognitive conflict

A new perspective on the role of the frontoparietal regions in Stroop‐like conflicts

Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.

Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks

Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task

The influence of task-irrelevant color perception on flanker task performance: Insights from behavioral and ERP data

A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

Disentangling three different conflicts at non-response/semantic and response levels in a new stroop-matching task

The Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes in the Human Brain

When conflict influences liking: The case of the Stroop task

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning

Cognitive conflict does not always mean high effort: Task difficulty's moderating effect on cardiac response

Conflict Adaptation in the Perception of Emotional Valence in A Stroop Task

Response Modality and the Stroop Task