Abstract:Abstract The goal of the current study was to interrogate aspects of the cascade-of-control model [Banich, M. T. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 89–94, 2009; Banich, M. T. The Stroop effect occurs at multiple points along a cascade of control: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2164, 2019], a neurocognitive model that posits how portions of pFC interact in a cascade-like manner to overcome interference from task-irrelevant information, and to test whether it could be used to predict individual differences in cognitive control outside the scanner. Participants (n = 62) completed two fMRI Word–Picture Stroop tasks, one containing emotional stimuli and one containing non-emotional stimuli, as well as a behavioral out-of-scanner Color–Word Stroop task at each of two time points. In a departure from the traditional approach of using a single task contrast to index neural activation across all ROIs, the current study utilized specific ROI by contrast pairings selected based on the specific level of control hypothesized by the cascade-of-control model to occur within that region. In addition, data across both tasks and both time points were combined to create composite measures of neural activation and of behavior. Consistent with the cascade-of-control model, individual differences in brain activation for specific contrasts within each of the three ROIs were associated with behavioral interference on the standard Color–Word Stroop task. Testing of alternative models revealed that these brain–behavior relationships were specific to the theoretically driven ROI by contrast pairings. Furthermore, such relationships were not observed across single-task and single-time point measures, but instead emerged from the composite measures. These findings provide evidence that brain activation observed across multiple regions of frontal cortex, each of which likely exerts cognitive control in a differential manner, is capable of predicting individual differences in behavioral performance.

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

The Influence Of Stimulant Material Category On The Stroop Dilution Effect

Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.

The Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes in the Human Brain

The Stroop Effect of Monocolors

The Stroop effect and mental imagery

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.

Priming the distractor can eliminate the Stroop interference effect

The Influence of Attentional Control on Stimulus Processing is Category Specific in Stroop Tasks

Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks

An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task

Brain Functional Mechanisms in Attentional Processing Following Modified Conflict Stroop Task

A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes

The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task.

Response Modality and the Stroop Task

The contribution of difficulty of an irrelevant task to task conflict

Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task

Composite Measures of Brain Activation Predict Individual Differences in Behavioral Stroop Interference