Abstract:The Stroop effect is referred to the failure to focus exclusively on the target dimension of a stimulus,because of the task-irrelevant dimension of the same stimulus.For example,when naming the print color of color words,people seem unable to prevent processes of reading even when such processes are irrelevant to the task at hand and can hurt performance.While,the emotional Stroop effect is defined as the interference between emotional information and the non-emotional information of the same stimulus.For example,usually,people read or name the color of emotionally charged words or threat words both are slower than neutral words. There are two different views on the relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect.One is the selective attention mechanism,which argues that the emotional Stroop is a variant of the Stroop paradigm.It assumes that both the Stroop and the emotional Stroop effects document the failure of fully selective focusing on target dimension of the stimuli.The other account is the threat-driven mechanism,which postulates that the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect are two independent and different phenomena.The competing account attributes the emotional delay to a threat-driven generic slowdown,but not a selective attention mechanism associated with the classic Stroop effect.To resolve the controversy,this study was to explore the relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect at the level of latent variables.The latent variable approach is highly theory-driven and can alleviate the task impurity problem.Therefore,this latent variable approach has several important advantages over a more common approach of relying on zero-order correlations and Exploratory Factor Analysis,particularly in the context of studying the relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect. In present study,133 undergraduates,from 17 to 23 years old,attended six tasks respectively.All participants didn' t know the purpose of the experiment and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision.Stimulus presentation and data collection were controlled by a Founder microcomputer running E-prime software. In this study,we used three tasks to assess the Stroop effect.In the location-decision task,participants were instructed to decide the location of the stimuli.In the picture-word interference task,participants were asked to name the pictures.In the color word interference task,participants were required to name the color of the stimuli.In the above three tasks,participants were instructed to ignore the semantic information of the stimuli. Similarly,in this study,we used three tasks to evaluate the emotional Stroop effect.In the emotional facial gender-decision task, participants were asked to judge the gender of the emotional faces.In the affective lexical decision task,participants were instructed to decide the lexical stimuli either true words or non-words.In the affective picture color-naming task,participants were required to name the color of the frames of the pictures.In the above three tasks,participants were asked to ignore the emotional information of the stimuli. Then,we calculated the Stroop effect size and the emotional Stroop effect size,and explored the relationship between the two effects at the level of latent variables through the method of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.The results showed:(1) There were significant Stroop interferences and emotional Stroop interferences among participants.(2) The emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect were two independent and different phenomena.In summary,these results provided further evidence for the threat-driven mechanism.The emotional Stroop effect was caused by a threat-driven generic slowdown,rather than a selective attention mechanism associated with the classic Stroop effect.

The Stroop effect and mental imagery

The Influence Of Stimulant Material Category On The Stroop Dilution Effect

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

A Review of the Research and Theories about Stroop Dilution Effect

Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.

The Stroop Effect of Monocolors

Is color words identification really not needed in attentional resources? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm

On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm

The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.

Response Modality and the Stroop Task

Working Memory Operates Over The Same Representations As Attention

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

The Relationship Between the Emotional Stroop Effect and the Stroop Effect

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

Effects of alerting signals on the spatial Stroop effect: evidence for modality differences

The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance

Grapheme-color synesthesia interferes with color perception in a standard Stroop task

The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task.

The Taste-Visual Cross-Modal Stroop Effect: an Event-Related Brain Potential Study

Brain mechanism of Stroop interference effect in Chinese characters.

What drives the automatic retrieval of real-world object size knowledge?