Abstract:Concurrent verbal working memory task can eliminate the color-word Stroop effect. Previous research, based on specific and limited resources, suggested that the disappearance of the conflict effect was due to the memory information preempting the resources for distractors. However, it remains unclear which particular stage of Stroop conflict processing is influenced by working memory loads. In this study, electroencephalography (EEG) recordings with event-related potential (ERP) analyses, time-frequency analyses, multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA), and representational similarity analyses (RSA) were applied to provide an in-depth investigation of the aforementioned issue. Subjects were required to complete the single task (the classical manual color-word Stroop task) and the dual task (the Sternberg working memory task combined with the Stroop task), respectively. Behaviorally, the results indicated that the Stroop effect was eliminated in the dual-task condition. The EEG results showed that the concurrent working memory task did not modulate the P1, N450, and alpha bands. However, it modulated the sustained potential (SP), late theta (740-820 ms), and beta (920-1040 ms) power, showing no difference between congruent and incongruent trials in the dual-task condition but significant difference in the single-task condition. Importantly, the RSA results revealed that the neural activation pattern of the late theta was similar to the response interaction pattern. Together, these findings implied that concurrent working memory task eliminated the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: How do concurrent working memory tasks affect the dynamic neural mechanisms of the Stroop effect? Specifically, the researchers aim to explore the specific impact of working memory load on different stages of Stroop conflict processing (including stimulus processing, stimulus-response mapping, and response output stages) using electrophysiological techniques such as event-related potentials (ERP), time-frequency analysis, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), and representational similarity analysis (RSA). ### Background and Problem 1. **Stroop Effect**: The Stroop effect refers to the phenomenon where reaction times are longer and accuracy is lower in incongruent conditions compared to congruent conditions in a color-word Stroop task. 2. **Impact of Concurrent Working Memory Tasks**: Previous studies have shown that performing concurrent verbal working memory tasks can reduce or eliminate the Stroop effect. However, it is unclear which stage of Stroop conflict processing is affected by the working memory load. ### Research Objectives - **Behavioral Verification**: Confirm whether concurrent working memory tasks can eliminate the Stroop effect. - **Exploring Neural Mechanisms**: Investigate the specific neural mechanisms of how working memory load affects Stroop conflict processing using high temporal resolution electrophysiological techniques, particularly whether it affects early or late stages. ### Methods - **Experimental Design**: - **Single Task**: Classic Stroop task. - **Dual Task**: Combination of Stroop task and Sternberg working memory task. - **Electrophysiological Techniques**: - **ERP**: Analyze components such as P1, N450, and SP. - **Time-Frequency Analysis**: Analyze activities in theta, alpha, and beta bands. - **MVPA**: Identify differential features between different task types. - **RSA**: Establish the link between behavior and neural activity. ### Main Findings - **Behavioral Results**: In the single-task condition, reaction times in the incongruent condition were significantly slower than in the congruent condition; in the dual-task condition, there was no significant difference in reaction times between the two conditions. - **ERP Results**: - **P1**: Task type had a significant effect on P1 amplitude, but there was no significant interaction with congruency. - **N450**: Both task type and congruency had significant effects on N450 amplitude, but there was no significant interaction. - **SP**: There was a significant interaction between task type and congruency; in the single-task condition, SP amplitude was significantly greater in the incongruent condition than in the congruent condition, while in the dual-task condition, there was no significant difference. - **MVPA Results**: Conflict effects could only successfully classify different task types in the theta band (740-820 ms) and beta band (920-1040 ms). - **Time-Frequency Results**: - **Theta Band**: There was a significant interaction between task type and congruency; in the single-task condition, theta power was significantly higher in the incongruent condition than in the congruent condition, while in the dual-task condition, there was no significant difference. - **Beta Band**: Both task type and congruency had significant effects on beta power, and there was a significant interaction; in the single-task condition, beta power was significantly lower in the incongruent condition than in the congruent condition, while in the dual-task condition, there was no significant difference. - **RSA Results**: Only the interaction pattern in the theta band was significantly correlated with the interaction pattern of reaction times. ### Conclusion The results suggest that when memory information overlaps with the interference dimension, working memory processing primarily affects the late stage of Stroop conflict processing, particularly the stimulus-response mapping process, rather than the early perceptual processing and conflict detection stages. This finding provides a new neural mechanism explanation for how working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect.

Temporal dynamics analysis reveals that concurrent working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping

Concurrent Working Memory Task Decreases the Stroop Interference Effect As Indexed by the Decreased Theta Oscillations.

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance

Working Memory Operates Over The Same Representations As Attention

Effective Connectivity Analysis Reveals the Time Course of the Stroop Effect in Manual Responding

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.

Neural Correlates of Stimulus and Response Interference in a 2–1 Mapping Stroop Task

Interactions Between Working Memory and Selective Attention

Neural Activity is Dynamically Modulated by Memory Load During the Maintenance of Spatial Objects

The Relationship Between the Emotional Stroop Effect and the Stroop Effect

The Complex Pre-Execution Stage Of Auditory Cognitive Control: Erps Evidence From Stroop Tasks

The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task.

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

The effect of high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the resolution of response, semantic and task conflict in the colour-word Stroop task

Hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals of conflict processing in the Chinese-character Stroop task: a simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential study.

Verbal Working Memory Affects Semantic Conflict in Stroop Task

Evaluating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Memory-Guided Attention with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

The Neural Mechanisms of Semantic and Response Conflicts: an Fmri Study of Practice-Related Effects in the Stroop Task