Abstract:Previous studies have demonstrated that there are separate neural mechanisms underlying semantic and response conflicts in the Stroop task. However, the practice effects of these conflicts need to be elucidated and the possible involvements of common neural mechanisms are yet to be established. We employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a 4-2 mapping practice-related Stroop task to determine the neural substrates under these conflicts. Results showed that different patterns of brain activations are associated with practice in the attentional networks (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC)) for both conflicts, response control regions (e.g., inferior frontal junction (IFJ), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)/insula, and pre-supplementary motor areas (pre-SMA)) for semantic conflict, and posterior cortex for response conflict. We also found areas of common activation in the left hemisphere within the attentional networks, for the early practice stage in semantic conflict and the late stage in "pure" response conflict using conjunction analysis. The different practice effects indicate that there are distinct mechanisms underlying these two conflict types: semantic conflict practice effects are attributable to the automation of stimulus processing, conflict and response control; response conflict practice effects are attributable to the proportional increase of conflict-related cognitive resources. In addition, the areas of common activation suggest that the semantic conflict effect may contain a partial response conflict effect, particularly at the beginning of the task. These findings indicate that there are two kinds of response conflicts contained in the key-pressing Stroop task: the vocal-level (mainly in the early stage) and key-pressing (mainly in the late stage) response conflicts; thus, the use of the subtraction method for the exploration of semantic and response conflicts may need to be further examined.

Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.

Correlation between hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals dissociates neural correlates of conflict detection and resolution in a Stroop task: a simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential study

Electrophysiological Dynamics Reveal Distinct Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts

Frontal And Occipital-Parietal Alpha Oscillations Distinguish Between Stimulus Conflict And Response Conflict

Brain Mechanismof Resp onse Conflict and Stimulus Conflict:Evidence from an Event-Related Potential Study

The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task.

Hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals of conflict processing in the Chinese-character Stroop task: a simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential study.

cTBS to Right DLPFC Modulates Physiological Correlates of Conflict Processing: Evidence from a Stroop task

The Dissociable Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Conflict and Emotional Conflict Control: an ERP Study

EEG Neural Oscillatory Dynamics Reveal Semantic and Response Conflict at Difference Levels of Conflict Awareness

Neural Correlates of Stimulus and Response Interference in a 2–1 Mapping Stroop Task

Dissociable Early Attentional Control Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive and Affective Conflicts

Effective Connectivity Analysis Reveals the Time Course of the Stroop Effect in Manual Responding

Distinct mechanisms underlying cross-modal semantic conflict and response conflict processing

An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task

Different Stages, Different Signals: the Modulating Effect of Cognitive Conflict on Subsequent Processing.

Brain mechanism of Stroop interference effect in Chinese characters.

Cognitive Control Explored by Linear Modelling Behaviour and Fmri Data During Stroop Tasks

Brain potentials associated with the shape Stroop effect.

The Neural Mechanisms of Semantic and Response Conflicts: an Fmri Study of Practice-Related Effects in the Stroop Task

Temporal dynamics analysis reveals that concurrent working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping