Abstract:Abstract The goal of the current study was to interrogate aspects of the cascade-of-control model [Banich, M. T. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 89–94, 2009; Banich, M. T. The Stroop effect occurs at multiple points along a cascade of control: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2164, 2019], a neurocognitive model that posits how portions of pFC interact in a cascade-like manner to overcome interference from task-irrelevant information, and to test whether it could be used to predict individual differences in cognitive control outside the scanner. Participants (n = 62) completed two fMRI Word–Picture Stroop tasks, one containing emotional stimuli and one containing non-emotional stimuli, as well as a behavioral out-of-scanner Color–Word Stroop task at each of two time points. In a departure from the traditional approach of using a single task contrast to index neural activation across all ROIs, the current study utilized specific ROI by contrast pairings selected based on the specific level of control hypothesized by the cascade-of-control model to occur within that region. In addition, data across both tasks and both time points were combined to create composite measures of neural activation and of behavior. Consistent with the cascade-of-control model, individual differences in brain activation for specific contrasts within each of the three ROIs were associated with behavioral interference on the standard Color–Word Stroop task. Testing of alternative models revealed that these brain–behavior relationships were specific to the theoretically driven ROI by contrast pairings. Furthermore, such relationships were not observed across single-task and single-time point measures, but instead emerged from the composite measures. These findings provide evidence that brain activation observed across multiple regions of frontal cortex, each of which likely exerts cognitive control in a differential manner, is capable of predicting individual differences in behavioral performance.

The Influence Of Stimulant Material Category On The Stroop Dilution Effect

A Review of the Research and Theories about Stroop Dilution Effect

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Lateralized Stroop Interference Effect With Chinese Characters-1

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

Priming the distractor can eliminate the Stroop interference effect

Stroop Effect Adjustment Mechanisms Studied Using Fmri

Functional MRI study of the neural mechanism of component processing during Stroop task performance

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning

Response Modality and the Stroop Task

Interference control in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: differential Stroop effects for colour-naming versus counting

Temporal dynamics analysis reveals that concurrent working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping

Composite Measures of Brain Activation Predict Individual Differences in Behavioral Stroop Interference

Hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals of conflict processing in the Chinese-character Stroop task: a simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential study.

The influence of emotional interference on cognitive control: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies using the emotional Stroop task

Inhibitory modulation of speech trajectories: Evidence from a vowel-modified Stroop task

Decoding Selective Attention and Cognitive Control Processing Through Stroop Interference Effect: An Event-Related Electroencephalography-Derived Study

A color-digit Stroop task shows numerical influence on numerosity processing

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

Is handwriting constrained by phonology? Evidence from Stroop tasks with written responses and Chinese characters