Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Audit committee-auditor interlocking and disclosure of key audit matters

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

On the Effort-Saving Effect of Audit Committee–auditor Interlocking

The Effect of Disclosing Key Audit Matters and Accounting Standard Precision on the Audit Expectation Gap

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

The Association Between Changes in Key Audit Matters and Earnings Management Behavior in Companies

Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

Empirical Research on the Influence of the Effectiveness of Audit Committee to Audit Opinions

Does the disclosure of key audit matters improve the audit quality for sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China

Key Audit Matters and Debt Contracting: Evidence from China

The Determinants and Impact of Key Audit Matters Disclosure in the Auditor’s Report

Key audit matter disclosure and stock mispricing: Evidence from China

The Audit Committee's IT Expertise and Its Impact on the Disclosure of Cybersecurity Risk

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

Impacts of Mechanism of Blockholders Counterbalance on the Effectiveness of Auditing Constraints

Audit Committee Governance and Audit Opinion

Corporate carbon emissions management and the disclosure of key audit matters

The Impact of Audit Committee Financial Expertise on Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) Tone

The effect of key audit matters on the association of credit risk and earnings quality

Internal Control Quality: The Role of Critical Audit Matters Reporting