Abstract:Purpose This study examines (1) the extent of key audit matters (KAMs) reported by auditors is related to accounting estimates, (2) whether measurement uncertainty and management bias affect auditors to do so and (3) whether the use of accounting estimates, given the measurement uncertainty and management bias reported in KAMs adversely affects the decision usefulness of accounting information. Design/methodology/approach Data on key audit matters, accounting estimates, measurement uncertainty, management bias, etc. were collected from the auditor's reports of 351 sample Chinese listed firms. It employs regression analyses to assess the hypotheses on issues affecting the report of these key audit matters and the impacts on the decision usefulness of accounting information. Findings Fair value and impairment loss estimations make up of 2.6 and 44.1% of the 606 KAMs identified, respectively. Measurement uncertainty is positively, while management bias is negatively, affecting auditors report KAMs related to accounting estimates. The use of accounting estimates in firms where their auditors reported the KAMs related to accounting estimates does not enhance the value and predictive relevance of reported earnings. The assurance works on, and reporting of, KAMs served as a “red flag” about the accounting estimates. Practical implications The use of accounting estimates does not always lead to enhanced decision-useful accounting information. Auditors, in their stewardship role, shall ensure that the measurement uncertainty issue is appropriately identified, addressed and verified. In addition, they shall provide an effective check-and-balance to the accounting discretion managers have in providing decision-useful information from opportunistic reporting. Originality/value This study examines the proposition that while the use of estimates can enhance the decision usefulness of accounting information, it can also induce measurement uncertainty and management bias into financial reporting.

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

The effect of key audit matters on the association of credit risk and earnings quality

Does the disclosure of key audit matters improve the audit quality for sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China

The Association Between Changes in Key Audit Matters and Earnings Management Behavior in Companies

Key audit matter disclosure and stock mispricing: Evidence from China

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Critical Audit Matters: Possible Market Misinterpretation

The Impact of Financial Risk on Boilerplate of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Research on the influence of key audit matters on the audit quality of commercial banks-Evidence from China

Does audit regulation improve corporate decision making? Evidence from the disclosure of tax‐related key audit matters

The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk

Measurement uncertainty and management bias in accounting estimates: the perspective of key audit matters reported by Chinese firms' auditors

Measuring and analyzing the information entropy value of key Audit matters (KAMs) disclosure at the system and reporting scale

The Effect of KAMs Disclosure in the Extended Audit Report on Managerial Bad News Hoarding Behavior and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Audit Firm Characteristics

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

Unintended Effects of Critical Audit Matters: Early Evidence

The Disclosure and Consequences of U.S. Critical Audit Matters