Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

The Disclosure and Consequences of U.S. Critical Audit Matters

Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States

Determinants and consequence of critical audit matter disclosure: early evidence

Unintended Effects of Critical Audit Matters: Early Evidence

Critical Audit Matters: Possible Market Misinterpretation

Does the Reporting of Critical Audit Matters Affect Nonprofessional Investors’ Perceptions of Auditor Credibility, Information Overload, Audit Quality, and Investment Risk?

The Influence of Critical Audit Matters in the US on the Informativeness of Investors

The impact of critical audit matters on audit report lag and audit fees: evidence from the United States

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Internal Control Quality: The Role of Critical Audit Matters Reporting

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk

Expanded Auditor’s Reports and Voluntary Disclosure

Second-Year Evidence on the as 3101 Critical Audit Matters Disclosure

Disclosure of tax‐related critical audit matters and tax‐related outcomes

The Effect of Disclosing Key Audit Matters and Accounting Standard Precision on the Audit Expectation Gap

Does Goodwill-Related Critical Audit Matters Disclosure Influence Firms’ Financial Reporting Decisions? Evidence from Goodwill Impairment

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Corporate carbon emissions management and the disclosure of key audit matters

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

The Effect of KAMs Disclosure in the Extended Audit Report on Managerial Bad News Hoarding Behavior and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Audit Firm Characteristics