Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the strategies that auditors in Bangladesh follow in identifying and reporting key audit matters (KAMs). The study also examines the factors affecting auditors' strategies in the identification and disclosures of KAMs. Design/methodology/approach The authors have conducted interviews with audit partners, chief financial officers (CFOs) and regulators involved in KAMs reporting and monitoring. The authors have used the lens of institutional theory of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphism and the concept of decoupling. Findings Auditors have used a decoupling strategy by identifying and reporting greater number of industry-generic KAMs than that of other countries in an effort to minimize risks and avoid regulatory scrutiny, although they disclose remote risks as KAMs and mask severe problem areas of the client. Because of the principle-based approach of International Standards on Auditing (ISA) 701 and because of the pressure and misunderstanding from the audit committee, auditors report industry-generic items and generic descriptions of KAMs. Practical implications The findings have important implications for the standard setters and local and global audit firms for the diffusion of new auditing standards in different jurisdictions. Without the development of audit firm-level capability and the corporate governance environment, changes in standards may not be effective in achieving the objectives of the standards. Social implications Although auditors consider that the KAMs reporting requirements provide with opportunities to enhance audit profession's legitimacy and public trusts, the actual KAMs reporting practices are driven by the market logic, an urge to maintain the status quo with clients and eventual rationalization of the impairment of professional independence. Originality/value Given the dearth of prior research on the implementation and diffusion patterns of ISA 701 KAMs reporting, this study fills the gap in the literature. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first known study to examine auditors' strategic responses to balance among conflicting priorities in reporting KAMs.

The Effect of Disclosing Key Audit Matters and Accounting Standard Precision on the Audit Expectation Gap

Measurement uncertainty and management bias in accounting estimates: the perspective of key audit matters reported by Chinese firms' auditors

The Disclosure and Consequences of U.S. Critical Audit Matters

Does the disclosure of key audit matters improve the audit quality for sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

The effect of key audit matters on the association of credit risk and earnings quality

Does the Reporting of Critical Audit Matters Affect Nonprofessional Investors’ Perceptions of Auditor Credibility, Information Overload, Audit Quality, and Investment Risk?

Consequences of the implementation of expanded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality

The Effect of KAMs Disclosure in the Extended Audit Report on Managerial Bad News Hoarding Behavior and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Audit Firm Characteristics

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

Determinants and consequence of critical audit matter disclosure: early evidence

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China

Unintended Effects of Critical Audit Matters: Early Evidence

The Association Between Changes in Key Audit Matters and Earnings Management Behavior in Companies

Does audit regulation improve corporate decision making? Evidence from the disclosure of tax‐related key audit matters

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

It is a balancing act: understanding the key audit matters disclosure in the context of a developing country

The Determinants and Impact of Key Audit Matters Disclosure in the Auditor’s Report

Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States

Audit committee-auditor interlocking and disclosure of key audit matters