Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Wang Liangcheng,Han Hongling
2009-01-01
Abstract:This study examines the persistent monitoring effect of big auditors on earnings management of right issuers and non-issuers in the poor institutional setting of China.We argue that, as economic agents per se, big auditors, defined as international big auditors or domestic big10 auditors in China, have incentives to maximize their own utilities.Their utility-maximization behaviors would result in their various audit quality according to a broad variety of earnings management of their clients.Our results support this conjecture.We find evidence that compared to small auditors, big auditors monitor earnings management in the rights issuers more effectively, as earnings management is measured by positive discretionary accruals and absolute discretionary accruals.This monitoring effect of big auditors is significantly stronger for the group with right offerings than that without right offerings, because discretionary accruals and positive discretionary accruals of rights issuers are significantly higher than those of non-issuers.However, the evidence superficially suggests that big auditors don't constrain earnings management of the whole sample firms consisting of both rights issuers and non-issuers more effectively than small ones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?